Clinical evidence dossier
Mobile app for diabetes self-management
Diabetes self-management behaviors
Evidence signal
Evidence signal
Strong
This is an authoritative evidence signal supplied by Clinical Reference. It is not a formal clinical grade, treatment recommendation, or pooled effect estimate.
Evidence snapshot
- Authoritative support records
- 5
- Supporting studies available for review
- 5
- Randomized trials
- 4
- Reported effects
- 3
Clinical conclusion
Mobile app for diabetes self-management shows a moderate positive evidence signal for improving Diabetes self-management behaviors across the studied comparisons.
The conclusion and evidence-signal classification are distinct authoritative fields and are reproduced as published.
Observed effects
Evidence composition
- Non-randomized studies
- 0
- Other designs
- 0
- Unresolved designs
- 1
- Magnitude-eligible effects
- 0
Consistency
Consistency classification
Consistent
- Positive
- 4
- No effect
- 1
- Mixed
- 0
- Negative
- 0
Population and applicability
Structured population data were available for 5 of 5 supporting studies. 2 studies described participants with type 2 diabetes. 4 studies described adult participants.
This population information refers to the materialized supporting studies available for review. Omitted support records remain part of the authoritative support accounting and are available through the audit experience.
View reported population descriptions
These descriptions are reported across the supporting studies; they are not a single synthesized population.
- Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
- Patients at risk for diabetes or with existing diabetes management challenges.
- Young Adult (19–39)
- Middle Aged (40-64)
- Male
- Female
- with T2 Diabetes
- Adults diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Individuals seeking to improve their diabetes self-management.
- Adults diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes.
- Patients seeking to improve self-management of their diabetes.
Limitations
- 2 supporting studies do not have a displayable topic-matched quantitative effect.
- Evidence uses heterogeneous comparison contexts: baseline_within_group, usual_care.
- 1 supporting study has high, serious, critical, unclear, or unavailable risk-of-bias information.
Supporting evidence
Inspect the authoritative studies and omitted support records for this dossier.