Pilot protocol compares Ayurvedic Nimba-Amalakyadi powder versus metformin for type 2 diabetes
Key takeaway:
This article is a pilot trial protocol in adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that plans to compare Nimba-Amalakyadi powder against metformin over 45 days, with follow-up to day 90, and no final efficacy results are reported yet.
Study at a glance
What was studied
A pilot randomized protocol comparing Nimba-Amalakyadi powder versus metformin in type 2 diabetes.
Study type
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
duration
Short-Term (≤3 mo)
Intervention
Nimba-Amalakyadi powder, Metformin
Outcomes
HbA1c, Fasting Plasma Glucose, Postprandial glucose, Urine sugar
Funding
Non-industry sponsored
Main effects
No completed comparative efficacy results reported in this protocol publication
Planned glycemic endpoints include HbA1c, fasting blood sugar, postprandial glucose, and urine sugar
Feasibility endpoints include recruitment, retention, adherence, acceptability, and data completeness
Evidence Summary
| Intervention | Outcome | Measured Change | Study Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
Metformin (Medications) | HbA1c (Glycemic Control) | Uncertain | Limited |
Nimba-Amalakyadi powder (Supplements) | Fasting Plasma Glucose (Glycemic Control) | Uncertain | Limited |
Nimba-Amalakyadi powder (Supplements) | HbA1c (Glycemic Control) | Uncertain | Limited |
Nimba-Amalakyadi powder (Supplements) | Postprandial glucose (Glycemic Control) | Uncertain | Limited |
Nimba-Amalakyadi powder (Supplements) | Urine sugar (Glycemic Control) | Uncertain | Limited |
Unlock Full Evidence Analysis
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Evidence Suggest
- Methods section specifies randomized allocation with two groups and 45-day intervention exposure plus day-90 follow-up.
- The paper explicitly identifies itself as a protocol and states final results are expected after completion phases.
- Outcome variables are described as planned measurements rather than reported comparative endpoint results.
Who this applies to
Adults aged 20-60 years with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (<6 months)
Keep in Mind
Interpret this as a protocol, not a completed efficacy trial.
Between the Lines
- This publication is a protocol and does not report final efficacy results.
- Small planned pilot sample size (n=36) limits inferential strength.
- Open-label design may introduce performance and expectation biases.
- Single-center setting may limit generalizability.
Unlock Full Analysis
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Journal Reference
Sawarkar P, Sawarkar GR. Evaluation of the comparative efficacy of an Ayurvedic formulation (Nimba-Amalakyadi powder) vs metformin in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: protocol for a pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2026;15:e63574. doi:10.2196/63574
Connected Evidence
Discover how this study fits into the broader diabetes evidence landscape.
This study contributes to evidence on Metformin and Fasting Plasma Glucose, Metformin and HbA1c.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ArchiveThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention–outcome relationships.
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
HbA1c Evidence Hub
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
Fasting Plasma Glucose Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Fasting Plasma Glucose
Measures Fasting Plasma Glucose as a key outcome.
Metformin Evidence Hub
All studies on Metformin
Contributes to Metformin evidence base.
Explore more in the evidence archive
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
All studies on Metformin and Fasting Plasma Glucose
2 results
All studies on Metformin and HbA1c
3 results
All studies on Metformin
2 results
All studies measuring Fasting Plasma Glucose
2 results
All studies measuring HbA1c
3 results
Questions this evidence helps answer
Key clinical and research questions this study contributes to.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
