Research Summary

SMS Program Improves Transition from Insulin to GLP-1 RA in Diabetes

Key finding

Insulin lowered by ≥50% in 55/72 (76.39%) patients.

This pilot study evaluated a mobile insulin titration intervention for transitioning patients with Type 2 Diabetes from basal insulin to GLP-1 receptor agonists, showing promising outcomes.

Evidence strength

Moderate confidence

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Some Concerns bias
Last updated July 8, 2026

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

Population

Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes

Intervention

Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention (MITI)–GLP1 program

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Primary outcome

Insulin dose reduction by at least 50%

Evidence

Moderate confidence

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This pilot study evaluated a mobile insulin titration intervention for transitioning patients with Type 2 Diabetes from basal insulin to GLP-1 receptor agonists, showing promising outcomes.

Clinical relevance

This study highlights the potential of mobile health interventions in managing Type 2 Diabetes, particularly in transitioning patients to more effective treatments. By reducing reliance on insulin and promoting GLP-1 receptor agonists, it may enhance patient outcomes and adherence to treatment.

Keep in mind

Non-randomized study design limits causal inference. Small sample size may affect generalizability. Lack of long-term follow-up data.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Natalie L, Katie N, Sherlane B, et al. A Mobile Insulin Titration Intervention Using SMS Text Messaging to Transition Patients with Type 2 Diabetes from Basal Insulin to GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Pilot Study. JMIR Formative Research. 2026;10:e76993. doi:10.2196/76993

Save this study and add notes to your research library.

Main Effects

Insulin was reduced by at least 50% in 55 out of 72 patients (76.39%).

Insulin was completely stopped in 45 out of 72 patients (62.50%).

GLP-1 RA dose was increased by at least one level in 64 out of 72 patients (88.89%).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to GLP-1 receptor agonists and Hyperglycemia events, Percentage of SMS text message responses reporting hypoglycemia (<80 mg/dL), Percentage of patients discharged on maximum GLP-1 RA dose, and 3 more.

Primary intervention

GLP-1 receptor agonists

Primary outcomes

  • Hyperglycemia events
  • Percentage of SMS text message responses reporting hypoglycemia (<80 mg/dL)
  • Percentage of patients discharged on maximum GLP-1 RA dose

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

6
Evidence pairs
6
Relationships
2
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 69

2

Related topics

6

Evidence pairs

125

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 6 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

NoneNo Change

Hyperglycemia events

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Hyperglycemia events

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Hyperglycemia events

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeSafety
Unlock full evidence details
StrongIncrease

Percentage of patients discharged on maximum GLP-1 RA dose

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of patients discharged on maximum GLP-1 RA dose

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of patients discharged on maximum GLP-1 RA dose

Evidence profile

StrongIncreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
StrongIncrease

Percentage of patients with GLP-1 RA dose increased by at least one level

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of patients with GLP-1 RA dose increased by at least one level

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of patients with GLP-1 RA dose increased by at least one level

Evidence profile

StrongIncreaseMetabolic Health
Unlock full evidence details
StrongDecrease

Percentage of patients with insulin dose reduction by at least 50%

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of patients with insulin dose reduction by at least 50%

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of patients with insulin dose reduction by at least 50%

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseGlycemic Control
Unlock full evidence details
StrongDecrease

Percentage of patients with insulin stopped completely

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of patients with insulin stopped completely

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of patients with insulin stopped completely

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

Percentage of SMS text message responses reporting hypoglycemia (<80 mg/dL)

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of SMS text message responses reporting hypoglycemia (<80 mg/dL)

GLP-1 receptor agonists → Percentage of SMS text message responses reporting hypoglycemia (<80 mg/dL)

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeSafety
Unlock full evidence details

Unlock full evidence analysis

Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • 76% of patients reduced insulin by at least 50%.
  • 63% of patients stopped insulin completely.
  • 89% of patients increased GLP-1 RA dosing.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.
  • Patients currently using basal insulin.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not be applicable to all diabetes populations.
  • The intervention's effectiveness over a longer period is unknown.
  • Further studies are needed to confirm findings and assess safety.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Non-randomized study design limits causal inference.
  • Small sample size may affect generalizability.
  • Lack of long-term follow-up data.

Unlock Full Analysis

Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Percentage of patients with GLP-1 RA dose increased by at least one level, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Percentage of patients with insulin dose reduction by at least 50%.

Included in these evidence collections

Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.

Explore more in the evidence archive

Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.

Questions answered by this study

Does GLP-1 receptor agonists improve percentage of patients discharged on maximum glp-1 ra dose?

Emerging Evidence

GLP-1 receptor agonists appears to improve Percentage of patients discharged on maximum GLP-1 RA dose.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Percentage of patients discharged on maximum GLP-1 RA dose

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 50.5 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does GLP-1 receptor agonists improve percentage of patients with glp-1 ra dose increased by at least one level?

Emerging Evidence

GLP-1 receptor agonists appears to improve Percentage of patients with GLP-1 RA dose increased by at least one level.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Percentage of patients with GLP-1 RA dose increased by at least one level

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 50.5 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does GLP-1 receptor agonists improve percentage of patients with insulin dose reduction by at least 50%?

Emerging Evidence

GLP-1 receptor agonists appears to improve Percentage of patients with insulin dose reduction by at least 50%.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Percentage of patients with insulin dose reduction by at least 50%

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 50.5 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does GLP-1 receptor agonists improve percentage of patients with insulin stopped completely?

Emerging Evidence

GLP-1 receptor agonists appears to improve Percentage of patients with insulin stopped completely.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Percentage of patients with insulin stopped completely

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 50.5 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.