Cardiovascular RiskSemaglutide

Clinical evidence dossier

Semaglutide

Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Evidence signal

Authoritative evidence signal

strong

This is an authoritative evidence signal supplied by Clinical Reference. It is not a formal clinical grade, treatment recommendation, or pooled effect estimate.

Evidence snapshot

Authoritative support records
7
Supporting studies available for review
7
Randomized trials
7
Reported effects
13

Clinical conclusion

Semaglutide shows a strong positive evidence signal for improving Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization) across the studied comparisons.

Observed effects

Observed study estimates; not a pooled treatment effect.

Between-group effect

Absolute change

38.2 to 51.8 %

2 eligible estimates109–156 weeksObserved median: 45 %

Evidence composition

Non-randomized studies
0
Other designs
0
Unresolved designs
0
Magnitude-eligible effects
2

Consistency

Authoritative consistency classification

mostly_consistent

Positive
5
No effect
2
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Population and applicability

Structured population data were available for 7 of 7 supporting studies. 6 studies described participants with type 2 diabetes. 7 studies described adult participants.

This population information refers to the materialized supporting studies available for review. Omitted support records remain part of the authoritative support accounting and are available through the audit experience.

View reported population descriptions

These descriptions are reported across the supporting studies; they are not a single synthesized population.

  • Adults with type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients at risk for cardiovascular events.
  • Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
  • Individuals at risk for cardiovascular events.
  • Patients at risk for heart failure events.
  • Individuals at high cardiovascular risk.
  • Patients with chronic kidney disease.
  • Adults with overweight or obesity.
  • Individuals with established cardiovascular disease without diabetes.
  • Adults aged 18 and older with type 2 diabetes.

Limitations

  • 4 supporting studies do not have a displayable topic-matched quantitative effect.
  • Evidence uses heterogeneous comparison contexts: placebo, usual_care.
  • 3 supporting studies have high, serious, critical, unclear, or unavailable risk-of-bias information.
  • 1 study contains conflicting p-value and significance fields; those significance claims are suppressed.

Supporting evidence

Inspect the authoritative studies and omitted support records for this dossier.

View supporting evidence