Clinical evidence dossier
Semaglutide
Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
Evidence signal
Authoritative evidence signal
strong
This is an authoritative evidence signal supplied by Clinical Reference. It is not a formal clinical grade, treatment recommendation, or pooled effect estimate.
Evidence snapshot
- Authoritative support records
- 7
- Supporting studies available for review
- 7
- Randomized trials
- 7
- Reported effects
- 13
Clinical conclusion
Semaglutide shows a strong positive evidence signal for improving Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization) across the studied comparisons.
Observed effects
Observed study estimates; not a pooled treatment effect.
Between-group effect
Absolute change
38.2 to 51.8 %
Evidence composition
- Non-randomized studies
- 0
- Other designs
- 0
- Unresolved designs
- 0
- Magnitude-eligible effects
- 2
Consistency
Authoritative consistency classification
mostly_consistent
- Positive
- 5
- No effect
- 2
- Mixed
- 0
- Negative
- 0
Population and applicability
Structured population data were available for 7 of 7 supporting studies. 6 studies described participants with type 2 diabetes. 7 studies described adult participants.
This population information refers to the materialized supporting studies available for review. Omitted support records remain part of the authoritative support accounting and are available through the audit experience.
View reported population descriptions
These descriptions are reported across the supporting studies; they are not a single synthesized population.
- Adults with type 2 diabetes.
- Patients at risk for cardiovascular events.
- Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
- Individuals at risk for cardiovascular events.
- Patients at risk for heart failure events.
- Individuals at high cardiovascular risk.
- Patients with chronic kidney disease.
- Adults with overweight or obesity.
- Individuals with established cardiovascular disease without diabetes.
- Adults aged 18 and older with type 2 diabetes.
Limitations
- 4 supporting studies do not have a displayable topic-matched quantitative effect.
- Evidence uses heterogeneous comparison contexts: placebo, usual_care.
- 3 supporting studies have high, serious, critical, unclear, or unavailable risk-of-bias information.
- 1 study contains conflicting p-value and significance fields; those significance claims are suppressed.
Supporting evidence
Inspect the authoritative studies and omitted support records for this dossier.
