Clinical evidence dossier
Remote multiprofessional educational program
HbA1c
Evidence signal
Authoritative evidence signal
strong
This is an authoritative evidence signal supplied by Clinical Reference. It is not a formal clinical grade, treatment recommendation, or pooled effect estimate.
Evidence snapshot
- Authoritative support records
- 4
- Supporting studies available for review
- 4
- Randomized trials
- 4
- Reported effects
- 8
Clinical conclusion
Remote multiprofessional educational program shows a strong positive evidence signal for improving HbA1c across the studied comparisons.
Observed effects
Observed study estimates; not a pooled treatment effect.
Change from baseline
Absolute change
-1.5 to 0 %
Change from baseline
Mean difference
-0.5 to -0.2 %
Change from baseline
Mean difference
-4.2 to -4.2 mmol/mol
Evidence composition
- Non-randomized studies
- 0
- Other designs
- 0
- Unresolved designs
- 0
- Magnitude-eligible effects
- 8
Consistency
Authoritative consistency classification
consistent
- Positive
- 4
- No effect
- 0
- Mixed
- 0
- Negative
- 0
Population and applicability
Structured population data were available for 4 of 4 supporting studies. Diabetes type was heterogeneous: 2 studies with type 2 diabetes, 1 studies with type 1 diabetes. 4 studies described adult participants.
This population information refers to the materialized supporting studies available for review. Omitted support records remain part of the authoritative support accounting and are available through the audit experience.
View reported population descriptions
These descriptions are reported across the supporting studies; they are not a single synthesized population.
- Adults with diabetes seeking improved management strategies.
- Patients interested in digital health solutions for chronic conditions.
- Adults diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
- Patients seeking to improve their diabetes management through education.
- Adults with type 2 diabetes.
- Patients seeking to improve their diabetes self-care.
- Young adults aged 18-30 with type 1 diabetes
- Individuals seeking alternative diabetes management strategies
Limitations
- Evidence uses heterogeneous comparison contexts: active_comparator, baseline_within_group, usual_care.
- 1 supporting study has high, serious, critical, unclear, or unavailable risk-of-bias information.
Supporting evidence
Inspect the authoritative studies and omitted support records for this dossier.