Clinical evidence dossier
Rama Diabetes Care app
HbA1c
Evidence signal
Authoritative evidence signal
strong
This is an authoritative evidence signal supplied by Clinical Reference. It is not a formal clinical grade, treatment recommendation, or pooled effect estimate.
Evidence snapshot
- Authoritative support records
- 3
- Supporting studies available for review
- 3
- Randomized trials
- 3
- Reported effects
- 3
Clinical conclusion
Rama Diabetes Care app has not shown a clear effect on HbA1c in the available evidence.
The conclusion and evidence-signal classification are distinct authoritative fields and are reproduced as published.
Observed effects
Observed study estimates; not a pooled treatment effect.
Change from baseline
Mean difference
-0.49 to 0 %
Between-group effect
Mean difference
-0.24 to -0.24 %
Evidence composition
- Non-randomized studies
- 0
- Other designs
- 0
- Unresolved designs
- 0
- Magnitude-eligible effects
- 3
Consistency
Authoritative consistency classification
consistent
- Positive
- 0
- No effect
- 2
- Mixed
- 1
- Negative
- 0
Population and applicability
Structured population data were available for 3 of 3 supporting studies. 2 studies described participants with type 2 diabetes. 3 studies described adult participants.
This population information refers to the materialized supporting studies available for review. Omitted support records remain part of the authoritative support accounting and are available through the audit experience.
View reported population descriptions
These descriptions are reported across the supporting studies; they are not a single synthesized population.
- Adults aged 18-65 with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes.
- Individuals interested in mobile health interventions for diabetes management.
- Young Adult (19–39)
- Middle Aged (40-64)
- Male
- Female
- with T2 Diabetes
- Adults aged 18 and older with Type 2 diabetes.
- Individuals seeking to increase physical activity through mobile health interventions.
Limitations
- 1 supporting study does not have a displayable topic-matched quantitative effect.
- Evidence uses heterogeneous comparison contexts: baseline_within_group, usual_care.
Supporting evidence
Inspect the authoritative studies and omitted support records for this dossier.