How Connections Are Generated
Understand how deDiabetes links research studies to interventions, outcomes, evidence collections, and clinical questions.
What You Are Seeing
When you view a research study, deDiabetes analyzes the study within a broader evidence graph.
The graph connects:
- Research studies
- Interventions
- Outcomes
- Evidence relationships
- Evidence collections
- Clinical questions
These connections help place an individual study within the larger body of diabetes research.
Related Evidence Relationships
A study may be connected to one or more intervention–outcome relationships.
Example:
Dapagliflozin → HbA1cA relationship is created when the study evaluates an intervention and reports results for a specific outcome.
These relationships are extracted from structured study data and evidence records.
Evidence Collections
Studies can also appear in evidence collections.
Examples:
Dapagliflozin Evidence HubHbA1c Evidence HubCollections group studies that investigate a common intervention, outcome, or evidence topic.
Evidence Archive Links
The archive links shown on research pages are automatically generated filters that allow you to explore:
- All studies for an intervention
- All studies for an outcome
- All studies examining a specific intervention–outcome relationship
These links do not change the evidence; they simply help you navigate related research.
Questions This Evidence Helps Answer
Questions are generated from intervention–outcome relationships.
Example:
Does dapagliflozin improve HbA1c?These questions are intended as navigation aids that help readers discover relevant evidence more quickly.
They should not be interpreted as clinical recommendations.
How the Evidence Graph Works
At a high level:
Research Study
↓
Intervention(s)
↓
Outcome(s)
↓
Evidence Relationship
↓
Collections & QuestionsThe graph allows related studies to be grouped together and explored through a consistent evidence framework.
Important Note
Connections are generated from structured evidence data and quality-control rules. They are designed to improve navigation and discovery, but they do not replace reading the original study or reviewing the full body of evidence.
