Última actualización 21 de agosto de 2026
Key finding
HbA1c levels improved significantly in the intervention group in comparison to the control group (−0.9% ± 1.0% vs. −0.5% ± 1.0%, p = 0.044).
This study evaluated the feasibility of a digital diabetes-coaching program for patients with Type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements in HbA1c levels.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the feasibility of a digital diabetes-coaching program for patients with Type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements in HbA1c levels.
Improving HbA1c levels is crucial for managing Type 2 diabetes and reducing the risk of complications. This study highlights the potential of digital health interventions to enhance diabetes care, which may lead to better patient outcomes and more personalized management strategies.
Limited sample size may affect generalizability. No significant differences in quality of life or diabetes-related problems. Usability scores indicate potential areas for improvement in the digital system.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Marlo V, Larissa FB, Niveditha DDK, et al. Feasibility of Digital Diabetes-Coaching for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism. 2026;28(4):3377-3385. doi:10.1111/dom.70534
HbA1c levels improved significantly in the intervention group (−0.9% ± 1.0%) compared to the control group (−0.5% ± 1.0%, p = 0.044).
No significant differences were observed in health-related quality of life (SF-12) scores at 26-week follow-up.
No significant differences were observed in diabetes-related problems (PAID) scores at 26-week follow-up.
Average usability score of the digital management system was 55.4 ± 27.9.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Digital Management System with Remote Coaching and Diabetes Distress Scale score, HbA1c, Health-related quality of life, and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
391
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.
Evidencia principal
Tema de evidencia
matched_outcome
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching → Diabetes Distress Scale score
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching → Diabetes Distress Scale score
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching → HbA1c
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching → HbA1c
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching → Health-related quality of life
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching → Health-related quality of life
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching → System Usability Scale (SUS) score
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching → System Usability Scale (SUS) score
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Digital Management System with Remote Coaching and Diabetes Distress Scale score, Digital Management System with Remote Coaching and HbA1c.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Diabetes Distress Scale score
Measures Diabetes Distress Scale score as a key outcome.
All studies on Digital Management System with Remote Coaching
Contributes to Digital Management System with Remote Coaching evidence base.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Quality of Life Outcomes
Measures Quality of Life Outcomes as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Digital Management System with Remote Coaching appears to improve HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Digital Management System with Remote Coaching for Diabetes Distress Scale score.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Diabetes Distress Scale score
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Digital Management System with Remote Coaching for Health-related quality of life.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Health-related quality of life
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Digital Management System with Remote Coaching for System Usability Scale (SUS) score.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
System Usability Scale (SUS) score
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Centrada en la evidencia, no en la publicidad.
Tus datos siempre están protegidos.
Se agregan nuevos estudios todos los días.
