Resumen de Investigación
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Mobile health texting may improve patient-provider communication

Última actualización 8 de julio de 2026

Key finding

Overall, there was a substantive but nonsignificant decrease in the average CAHPS score over the 6-month trial period (−2.6; P =.11).

This study examined the effects of an adaptive mobile health texting intervention on patient-provider communication ratings. Results indicated a nonsignificant decrease in CAHPS scores over six months.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study examined the effects of an adaptive mobile health texting intervention on patient-provider communication ratings. Results indicated a nonsignificant decrease in CAHPS scores over six months.

Clinical relevance

Understanding how mobile health interventions affect patient perceptions of communication is crucial for improving healthcare delivery. Effective communication is linked to better patient outcomes, and this study highlights the need for further exploration of how technology can be leveraged in this area.

Keep in mind

The decrease in CAHPS scores was not statistically significant. The study may have limited generalizability due to the specific population sampled. Potential confounding factors were not controlled for in the analysis.

Published in

Referencia de la Revista

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Lynn L, Marvyn RAA, Adrian A, Courtney RL, Lorraine B. Examining the Impact of an Adaptive Mobile Health Texting-Based Intervention on Patient Ratings of Communication with Health Care Providers. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2025;13:e64296. doi:10.2196/64296

Efectos Principales

CAHPS scores decreased by -2.6 points, indicating a decline in patient satisfaction.

The decrease in CAHPS scores was nonsignificant (p=0.11).

No significant differences were observed between the intervention groups.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Exercise therapy and Patient-reported health care communication assessed via CAHPS scores.

Primary intervention

Exercise therapy

Primary outcomes

  • Patient-reported health care communication assessed via CAHPS scores

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

1
Evidence pairs
1
Relationships
0
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Limited contributionLow confidenceNetwork score: 38

0

Related topics

1

Evidence pairs

0

Related studies

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 1 evidence relationship
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 0 direct semantic evidence topics

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Patient-reported health care communication assessed via CAHPS scores

Exercise therapy → Patient-reported health care communication assessed via CAHPS scores

Exercise therapy → Patient-reported health care communication assessed via CAHPS scores

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

La Evidencia Sugiere

  • CAHPS scores showed a decrease of -2.6 points, indicating reduced patient satisfaction.
  • No significant differences were found between personalized and randomly selected SMS interventions.
  • The results suggest that texting interventions may not effectively improve communication ratings.
who this applies

A quién se aplica

  • Patients receiving care from healthcare providers involved in the study.
  • Individuals interested in mobile health interventions for improving communication.
keep in mind

Tener en Cuenta

  • The study's findings may not apply to all patient populations.
  • The nonsignificant results suggest caution in interpreting the effectiveness of SMS interventions.
  • Further research is needed to explore alternative strategies for enhancing patient-provider communication.
between the lines

Entre Líneas

  • The decrease in CAHPS scores was not statistically significant.
  • The study may have limited generalizability due to the specific population sampled.
  • Potential confounding factors were not controlled for in the analysis.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Exercise therapy and Patient-reported health care communication assessed via CAHPS scores.

Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Exercise therapy improve patient-reported health care communication assessed via cahps scores?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Exercise therapy for Patient-reported health care communication assessed via CAHPS scores.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Patient-reported health care communication assessed via CAHPS scores

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

Sin anuncios. Sin rastreo.

Centrada en la evidencia, no en la publicidad.

Segura y privada

Tus datos siempre están protegidos.

Siempre al día

Se agregan nuevos estudios todos los días.