Última actualización 15 de junio de 2026
Key finding
Change difference −0.95 kg, 95% CI −1.87 to −0.04; p=0.04. Intervention −0.23 kg vs usual care +0.72 kg
This study tested a lifestyle programme for new mothers who had gestational diabetes, to help prevent later type 2 diabetes. Women in the programme maintained their weight while those receiving usual care gained weight over 12 months. However, most women did not fully participate in the programme, and there were no clear improvements in waist size or blood sugar.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
Randomised controlled trial
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study tested a lifestyle programme for new mothers who had gestational diabetes, to help prevent later type 2 diabetes. Women in the programme maintained their weight while those receiving usual care gained weight over 12 months. However, most women did not fully participate in the programme, and there were no clear improvements in waist size or blood sugar.
Women who have had gestational diabetes are about seven times more likely to develop type 2 diabetes later in life. Finding ways to reach this younger population early is critical. This study shows a lifestyle programme can help prevent postnatal weight gain, which is a key risk factor. But the low engagement highlights that programmes need to be designed around the realities of new motherhood and competing family demands.
Low programme engagement: only 10% completed all sessions High attrition: 27% loss to follow-up in intervention group Baseline glucose profiles were near normal, limiting ability to detect changes Primary outcome (weight) significant but other primary outcomes (waist, glucose) non-significant
↓ Weight gain prevented: intervention group stable vs usual care +0.72 kg (difference −0.95 kg, p=0.04)
↔ Waist circumference: no significant difference between groups
↔ Fasting blood glucose: no significant difference between groups
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes and Body weight, Depression score, Fasting blood sugar (FBS), and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
422
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.
Evidencia principal
Tema de evidencia
matched_outcome
Evidencia relacionada
Tema de evidencia
Guardar evidencia
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Body weight
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Body weight
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Depression score
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Depression score
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Waist circumference
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes → Waist circumference
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes and Body Weight, Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes and Fasting Glucose.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Body Weight
Measures Body Weight as a key outcome.
All studies on Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes
Contributes to Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes evidence base.
All studies measuring Fasting Glucose
Measures Fasting Glucose as a key outcome.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
8 results
4 results
8 results
8 results
4 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes may improve Body weight.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Body weight
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 85.3 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes may improve Waist circumference.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Waist circumference
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 75.6 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes may improve Fasting blood sugar (FBS).
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 75.6 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes may improve Depression score.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Depression score
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Centrada en la evidencia, no en la publicidad.
Tus datos siempre están protegidos.
Se agregan nuevos estudios todos los días.
