Última actualización 16 de agosto de 2026
Key finding
IL-6 levels decreased significantly from baseline (152.54 ± 1.46 pg/µL) to 30 days (117.49 ± 1.50 pg/µL) after SRP (p=0.000).
This study investigated the impact of Scaling and Root Planing (SRP) on salivary IL-6 levels in chronic periodontitis patients with Type 2 diabetes, finding significant reductions in IL-6 and other periodontal measures.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Short-Term (≤3 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the impact of Scaling and Root Planing (SRP) on salivary IL-6 levels in chronic periodontitis patients with Type 2 diabetes, finding significant reductions in IL-6 and other periodontal measures.
These findings highlight the importance of periodontal treatment in patients with Type 2 diabetes, as managing gum disease may also help reduce systemic inflammation indicated by lower IL-6 levels. This could lead to better overall health outcomes for diabetic patients.
The study did not assess long-term effects beyond 30 days. Sample size and demographic diversity may limit generalizability. Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Alexander M, John RA, Sanghamitra G, et al. The Effect of Scaling and Root Planing on Salivary IL-6 Levels in Chronic Periodontitis Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45388. doi:10.7759/cureus.45388
Salivary IL-6 levels decreased significantly from 152.54 ± 1.46 pg/µL to 117.49 ± 1.50 pg/µL (p=0.000).
Plaque Index decreased from 3.77 ± 0.41 to 1.95 ± 0.36 (p=0.000).
Gingival Index decreased from 1.66 ± 0.19 to 0.35 ± 0.08 (p=0.000).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Scaling and root planing only and Change in Bleeding Index from Baseline to 8 Weeks, Gingival Index (GI), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and 3 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Scaling and root planing only
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
6
Evidence pairs
66
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.
Evidencia principal
Relación de evidencia
Evidencia relacionada
Tema de evidencia
Guardar evidencia
Intervención
Guardar evidencia
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Scaling and root planing only → Change in Bleeding Index from Baseline to 8 Weeks
Scaling and root planing only → Change in Bleeding Index from Baseline to 8 Weeks
Scaling and root planing only → Gingival Index (GI)
Scaling and root planing only → Gingival Index (GI)
Scaling and root planing only → Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Scaling and root planing only → Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Scaling and root planing only → Periodontal probing depth
Scaling and root planing only → Periodontal probing depth
Scaling and root planing only → Plaque Index (PI)
Scaling and root planing only → Plaque Index (PI)
Scaling and root planing only → Relative attachment level
Scaling and root planing only → Relative attachment level
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Scaling and Root Planing Procedures and Gingival Index (GI), Scaling and Root Planing Procedures and Periodontal probing depth.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Gingival Index (GI)
Measures Gingival Index (GI) as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Periodontal probing depth
Measures Periodontal probing depth as a key outcome.
All studies on Scaling and Root Planing Procedures
Contributes to Scaling and Root Planing Procedures evidence base.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
3 results
3 results
3 results
3 results
3 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Scaling and Root Planing Procedures appears to improve Inflammatory Markers.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Scaling and root planing only may improve Gingival Index (GI).
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Gingival Index (GI)
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Scaling and root planing only appears to improve Periodontal probing depth.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Periodontal probing depth
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 78.6 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Scaling and root planing only appears to improve Plaque Index (PI).
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Plaque Index (PI)
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Centrada en la evidencia, no en la publicidad.
Tus datos siempre están protegidos.
Se agregan nuevos estudios todos los días.
