Key finding
At 6 months, intervention participants had greater HbA1c reductions (−0.85% vs 0.35%) compared to the control.
CHW-led diabetes care with monthly group visits and weekly mHealth contact in uninsured adults with type 2 diabetes.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Primary outcome
HbA1c reduction at 6 months
Comparator
Usual care
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
CHW-led diabetes care with monthly group visits and weekly mHealth contact in uninsured adults with type 2 diabetes.
This study evaluated CHW-led diabetes care with monthly group visits and weekly mHealth contact in uninsured adults with type 2 diabetes.
Limitations were not clearly described in the extracted text.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Elizabeth MV, Xiaoying Y, Victor JC, et al. Transitioning TIME from Clinical Trials to Practical Implementation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 2025;16:21501319251339190. doi:10.1177/21501319251339190
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment and Attrition Rate of the Intervention, Fidelity of mHealth intervention, HbA1c, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
161
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Attrition Rate of the Intervention
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Attrition Rate of the Intervention
Evidence profile
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Fidelity of mHealth intervention
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Fidelity of mHealth intervention
Evidence profile
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → HbA1c
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → HbA1c
Evidence profile
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Self-reported medication adherence at 12 months
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Self-reported medication adherence at 12 months
Evidence profile
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Treatment satisfaction
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment → Treatment satisfaction
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment and Fidelity of mHealth intervention, TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment and HbA1c.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Fidelity of mHealth intervention
Measures Fidelity of mHealth intervention as a key outcome.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies on TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment
Contributes to TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment evidence base.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment appears to improve HbA1c.
ConsensusScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment appears to improve Attrition Rate of the Intervention.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Attrition Rate of the Intervention
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment appears to improve Fidelity of mHealth intervention.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Fidelity of mHealth intervention
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
TIME (Telehealth-supported Integrated Community Health Workers) - Active Treatment appears to improve Self-reported medication adherence at 12 months.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Self-reported medication adherence at 12 months
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 52.9 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
