HbA1c
DSMES → HbA1c
DSMES → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Key finding
Mean HbA1c decreased by 0.5% in the intervention group (P = 0.01).
This study evaluated a digital education platform for diabetes management against conventional outpatient education, finding significant improvements in HbA1c and treatment satisfaction.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Digital education platform with face-to-face education and remote monitoring, Conventional outpatient education
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Primary outcome
HbA1c
Comparator
Conventional outpatient education
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated a digital education platform for diabetes management against conventional outpatient education, finding significant improvements in HbA1c and treatment satisfaction.
These findings suggest that integrating digital tools into diabetes education can enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction. Improved HbA1c levels are crucial for reducing long-term complications associated with diabetes, making digital education a valuable addition to traditional methods.
The study did not assess long-term effects beyond six months. Sample size and demographic diversity were not specified. Potential biases in self-reported adherence were not addressed.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Lorraine B, Sasja DH, Mari AV, et al. Effectiveness of a Digital Education Platform for Diabetes Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2025;13:e67151. doi:10.2196/67151
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Mean HbA1c decreased by 0.5% in the intervention group (P = 0.01).
Mean HbA1c decreased by 0.2% in the control group.
Treatment satisfaction improved by 3.6 points in the intervention group (P = 0.006).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to DSMES, Remote multiprofessional educational program and HbA1c, Treatment adherence, Treatment satisfaction.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
DSMES
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
4
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
319
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
DSMES → HbA1c
DSMES → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Remote multiprofessional educational program → HbA1c
Remote multiprofessional educational program → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Treatment adherence
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Treatment adherence
Evidence profile
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Treatment satisfaction
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Treatment satisfaction
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs
Contributes to Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs evidence base.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
5 results
4 results
5 results
4 results
5 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 54.1 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 24 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Treatment Adherence.
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Treatment adherence
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 47.1 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 8 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Treatment Experience.
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Treatment satisfaction
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 46.4 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 4 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.