Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- 86
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 68
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 60
- generally_consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 10 studies
Add to Evidence TrackerResearch Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™
Digital education platform improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.
Last updated July 8, 2026
Key finding
Mean HbA1c decreased by 0.5% in the intervention group (P = 0.01).
This study evaluated a digital education platform for diabetes management against conventional outpatient education, finding significant improvements in HbA1c and treatment satisfaction.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated a digital education platform for diabetes management against conventional outpatient education, finding significant improvements in HbA1c and treatment satisfaction.
Clinical relevance
These findings suggest that integrating digital tools into diabetes education can enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction. Improved HbA1c levels are crucial for reducing long-term complications associated with diabetes, making digital education a valuable addition to traditional methods.
Keep in mind
The study did not assess long-term effects beyond six months. Sample size and demographic diversity were not specified. Potential biases in self-reported adherence were not addressed.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Lorraine B, Sasja DH, Mari AV, et al. Effectiveness of a Digital Education Platform for Diabetes Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2025;13:e67151. doi:10.2196/67151
Main Effects
Mean HbA1c decreased by 0.5% in the intervention group (P = 0.01).
Mean HbA1c decreased by 0.2% in the control group.
Treatment satisfaction improved by 3.6 points in the intervention group (P = 0.006).
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to DSMES, Remote multiprofessional educational program and HbA1c, Treatment adherence, Treatment satisfaction.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
DSMES
Primary outcomes
- HbA1c
- Treatment adherence
- Treatment satisfaction
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
4
Evidence pairs
4
Relationships
4
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 72
4
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
714
Related studies
High relevance in at least one topic
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 4 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c
Related evidence
Evidence relationship
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Treatment Adherence
Save evidence
Evidence relationship
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Treatment Experience
Save evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
HbA1c
Remote multiprofessional educational program → HbA1c
Remote multiprofessional educational program → HbA1c
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 88
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 4 studies
Add to Evidence TrackerTreatment adherence
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Treatment adherence
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Treatment adherence
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence TrackerTreatment satisfaction
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Treatment satisfaction
Remote multiprofessional educational program → Treatment satisfaction
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence TrackerEvidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- Digital education platform led to a 0.5% decrease in HbA1c levels.
- Treatment satisfaction increased by 3.6 points in the intervention group.
- No significant difference in medication adherence between groups (P = 0.59).
Who this applies to
- Adults with diabetes seeking improved management strategies.
- Patients interested in digital health solutions for chronic conditions.
Keep in Mind
- Results may not be generalizable to all diabetes populations.
- The study focused on short-term outcomes; long-term effects are unknown.
- Further research is needed to explore the impact of digital education on diverse populations.
Between the Lines
- The study did not assess long-term effects beyond six months.
- Sample size and demographic diversity were not specified.
- Potential biases in self-reported adherence were not addressed.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → HbA1c
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- 86
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 68
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 60
- generally_consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 10 studies
View evidenceBehavioral & Lifestyle
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → HbA1c
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Evidence Intelligence™
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 88
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 100
- consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 4 studies
View evidenceIncluded in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs Evidence Hub
All studies on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs
10 studies
intervention_hubContributes to Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs evidence base.
HbA1c Evidence Hub
All studies measuring HbA1c
10 studies
outcome_hubMeasures HbA1c as a key outcome.
Recent Diabetes Research
Latest published studies
recency_collection
Published within the last 2 years.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on DSMES and HbA1c
Intervention: DSMESOutcome: HbA1c
10 results
All studies on Remote multiprofessional educational program and HbA1c
Intervention: Remote multiprofessional educational programOutcome: HbA1c
4 results
All studies on DSMES
Intervention: DSMES
10 results
All studies on Remote multiprofessional educational program
Intervention: Remote multiprofessional educational program
4 results
All studies measuring HbA1c
Outcome: HbA1c
10 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve HbA1c?
Strong Evidence
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 86.2 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 38 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve treatment adherence?
Strong Evidence
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Treatment Adherence.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Treatment adherence
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve treatment experience?
Strong Evidence
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Treatment Experience.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Treatment satisfaction
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 3 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
Scalable diabetes education improves care coordinationIntegrated intervention improves diabetes and oral health outcomesMindfulness intervention reduces diabetes distress in veterans.Educational intervention improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patientsDigital Diabetes Program Improves Glycemic Control in Adults
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.