BEST score
Cocoa supplementation → BEST score
Cocoa supplementation → BEST score
Evidence profile
Key finding
In the cocoa group, the TCSS decreased by 2.63 points.
This study investigated the effects of cocoa supplementation on diabetic neuropathy in individuals with Type 2 Diabetes. Results indicated no significant differences between cocoa and placebo groups.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Cocoa supplementation, Placebo (methylcellulose)
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Primary outcome
Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)
Comparator
Placebo group
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the effects of cocoa supplementation on diabetic neuropathy in individuals with Type 2 Diabetes. Results indicated no significant differences between cocoa and placebo groups.
Understanding the effectiveness of dietary interventions like cocoa supplementation is crucial for managing diabetic neuropathy. If cocoa had shown significant benefits, it could have offered a simple dietary option for patients. However, the lack of significant findings indicates that further research is needed to explore effective treatments for this condition.
No significant differences were found between groups. Sample size and demographic characteristics were not specified. The study's findings may not be generalizable to all populations with Type 2 Diabetes.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Rebeca K, Gabriela G, Luisa FS, et al. The Effect of Cocoa Supplementation on Diabetic Neuropathy in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025;26(16):8033. doi:10.3390/ijms26168033
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
The TCSS decreased by 2.63 points in the cocoa group versus 1.84 points in the placebo group (p > 0.05).
The BEST score decreased by 1.45 points in the cocoa group compared to a 2.21 point decrease in the placebo group (p > 0.05).
Quality-of-Life questionnaire scores decreased by 9.2 points in the cocoa group, with no significant difference from the placebo group (p = 0.501).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Cocoa supplementation and BEST score, Quality of life, Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS).
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Cocoa supplementation
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
0
Related topics
3
Evidence pairs
0
Related studies
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Cocoa supplementation → BEST score
Cocoa supplementation → BEST score
Evidence profile
Cocoa supplementation → Quality of life
Cocoa supplementation → Quality of life
Evidence profile
Cocoa supplementation → Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)
Cocoa supplementation → Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Cocoa supplementation for BEST score.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
BEST score
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Cocoa supplementation for Quality of life.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Quality of life
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Cocoa supplementation for Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS).
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.