Diabetes knowledge
DSMES → Diabetes knowledge
DSMES → Diabetes knowledge
Evidence profile
Key finding
HbA1c improved from 7.62% (SD=1.81) to 7.27% (SD=0.33)
This study compared diabetes self-management education via telemedicine to face-to-face encounters, finding significant improvements in glycemic control and diabetes knowledge.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Diabetes self-management education via telemedicine
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Primary outcome
HbA1c
Comparator
Diabetes self-management education via face-to-face encounter
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study compared diabetes self-management education via telemedicine to face-to-face encounters, finding significant improvements in glycemic control and diabetes knowledge.
These findings are significant as they suggest that telemedicine can effectively enhance diabetes management, especially in populations with limited access to in-person healthcare. Improved glycemic control and knowledge can lead to better health outcomes for patients with diabetes, making telemedicine a valuable tool in chronic disease management.
Effectiveness of interventions was unclear in some outcomes Potential limitations in generalizability due to sample characteristics Study design constraints may affect the interpretation of results
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Jeannine AOS, Dionise YVB, Maria HSG. Diabetes self-management education via telemedicine compared to face-to-face encounters. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2024;8(Suppl 1):bvae163.997. doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.997
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
HbA1c improved from 7.62% to 7.27%, p=0.001
Proportion of participants with better glycemic control increased from 37.50% to 57.14%, p=0.027
Diabetes knowledge improved by 5.27%
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to DSMES and Diabetes knowledge, Diabetes self-management behaviors, HbA1c, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
DSMES
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
4
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
319
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
DSMES → Diabetes knowledge
DSMES → Diabetes knowledge
Evidence profile
DSMES → Diabetes self-management behaviors
DSMES → Diabetes self-management behaviors
Evidence profile
DSMES → HbA1c
DSMES → HbA1c
Evidence profile
DSMES → Proportion of participants with better glycemic control
DSMES → Proportion of participants with better glycemic control
Evidence profile
DSMES → Proportion of participants with good medication adherence
DSMES → Proportion of participants with good medication adherence
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Proportion of participants with better glycemic control.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs
Contributes to Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs evidence base.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Proportion of participants with better glycemic control
Measures Proportion of participants with better glycemic control as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
4 results
1 results
4 results
4 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Diabetes self-management behaviors
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 34.2 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 6 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 53.5 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 24 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
DSMES appears to improve Proportion of participants with better glycemic control.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Proportion of participants with better glycemic control
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 51.7 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
DSMES appears to improve Proportion of participants with good medication adherence.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Proportion of participants with good medication adherence
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 51.7 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.