- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Telemedicine improves diabetes self-management education access
Last updated July 8, 2026
Key finding
HbA1c improved from 7.62% (SD=1.81) to 7.27% (SD=0.33)
This study compared diabetes self-management education via telemedicine to face-to-face encounters, finding significant improvements in glycemic control and diabetes knowledge.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study compared diabetes self-management education via telemedicine to face-to-face encounters, finding significant improvements in glycemic control and diabetes knowledge.
Clinical relevance
These findings are significant as they suggest that telemedicine can effectively enhance diabetes management, especially in populations with limited access to in-person healthcare. Improved glycemic control and knowledge can lead to better health outcomes for patients with diabetes, making telemedicine a valuable tool in chronic disease management.
Keep in mind
Effectiveness of interventions was unclear in some outcomes Potential limitations in generalizability due to sample characteristics Study design constraints may affect the interpretation of results
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Jeannine AOS, Dionise YVB, Maria HSG. Diabetes self-management education via telemedicine compared to face-to-face encounters. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2024;8(Suppl 1):bvae163.997. doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.997
Main Effects
HbA1c improved from 7.62% to 7.27%, p=0.001
Proportion of participants with better glycemic control increased from 37.50% to 57.14%, p=0.027
Diabetes knowledge improved by 5.27%
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to DSMES and Diabetes knowledge, Diabetes self-management behaviors, HbA1c, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
DSMES
Primary outcomes
- Diabetes knowledge
- Diabetes self-management behaviors
- HbA1c
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
4
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
714
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 5 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy
Related evidence
Evidence relationship
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c
Save evidence
Evidence relationship
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Activities of Daily Living
Save evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Diabetes self-management behaviors
DSMES → Diabetes self-management behaviors
DSMES → Diabetes self-management behaviors
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 3 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 67
- Slightly Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
- EvidenceScore™
- 86
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 68
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 60
- generally_consistent
Proportion of participants with better glycemic control
DSMES → Proportion of participants with better glycemic control
DSMES → Proportion of participants with better glycemic control
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Proportion of participants with good medication adherence
DSMES → Proportion of participants with good medication adherence
DSMES → Proportion of participants with good medication adherence
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- Telemedicine increased the proportion of participants with good glycemic control by 19.64%, p=0.027
- Improvement in diabetes self-care adherence behavior by 13.25%
- Medication adherence increased from 58.33% to 61.90%, p=0.032
Who this applies to
- Adults with type 2 diabetes
- Individuals seeking alternative methods for diabetes education
Keep in Mind
- Results may not be generalizable to all populations
- Further studies needed to confirm long-term effectiveness
- Variability in individual responses to telemedicine interventions
Between the Lines
- Effectiveness of interventions was unclear in some outcomes
- Potential limitations in generalizability due to sample characteristics
- Study design constraints may affect the interpretation of results
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → HbA1c
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- 86
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 68
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 60
- generally_consistent
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 3 studies
- ImpactScore™
- 67
- Slightly Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 67
- generally_consistent
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs Evidence Hub
All studies on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs
Contributes to Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs evidence base.
HbA1c Evidence Hub
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy
Measures Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy as a key outcome.
Recent Diabetes Research
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on DSMES and HbA1c
10 results
All studies on DSMES and Diabetes self-management behaviors
3 results
All studies on DSMES
10 results
All studies measuring HbA1c
10 results
All studies measuring Diabetes self-management behaviors
3 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve diabetes management self-efficacy?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Diabetes self-management behaviors
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 18 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve HbA1c?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 86.2 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 38 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve activities of daily living?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Activities of Daily Living.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Diabetes knowledge
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 3 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does DSMES improve proportion of participants with better glycemic control?
DSMES appears to improve Proportion of participants with better glycemic control.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Proportion of participants with better glycemic control
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
