Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Digital intervention may prevent type 2 diabetes in high-risk adults

Last updated July 8, 2026

Key finding

Participants reported an increase in daily steps taken.

The VA|PREVENTION project aimed to prevent type 2 diabetes in high-risk adults using a digital intervention. Participants showed improvements in walking and dietary behaviors.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

The VA|PREVENTION project aimed to prevent type 2 diabetes in high-risk adults using a digital intervention. Participants showed improvements in walking and dietary behaviors.

Clinical relevance

Preventing type 2 diabetes is crucial, especially for high-risk adults. This study highlights how digital tools can effectively encourage healthier lifestyle choices, potentially reducing diabetes incidence and improving overall health outcomes in this population.

Keep in mind

Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear. Self-reported data may introduce bias. Limited generalizability due to specific population focus.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

J A, I BF, J B, M MM, N P, M PG. VA|PREVENTION project: A person-centered digital intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes among high-risk adults. The European Journal of Public Health. 2024;34(Suppl 3):ckae144.414. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.414

Main Effects

Participants increased their daily steps by 2000.

Participants increased their fruit consumption by 1.5 servings.

Participants decreased their red meat intake by 1 serving.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach and Daily step count, Fruit and vegetable intake, Reduction in red meat intake.

Primary intervention

VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach

Primary outcomes

  • Daily step count
  • Fruit and vegetable intake
  • Reduction in red meat intake

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

3
Evidence pairs
3
Relationships
1
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 59

1

Related topics

3

Evidence pairs

107

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence relationship

Virtual Reality Interventions and Activities of Daily Living

Related evidence

Evidence topic

Treatment Adherence

Save evidence

Intervention

Virtual Reality Interventions

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Daily step count

VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach → Daily step count

VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach → Daily step count

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Fruit and vegetable intake

VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach → Fruit and vegetable intake

VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach → Fruit and vegetable intake

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Reduction in red meat intake

VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach → Reduction in red meat intake

VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach → Reduction in red meat intake

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Participants reported an increase of 2000 steps daily.
  • Fruit consumption increased by 1.5 servings.
  • Red meat intake decreased by 1 serving.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • High-risk adults for type 2 diabetes.
  • Individuals seeking to improve lifestyle behaviors.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results are based on self-reported data, which may not be fully reliable.
  • The study's effectiveness is currently unclear.
  • Findings may not be applicable to all demographic groups.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear.
  • Self-reported data may introduce bias.
  • Limited generalizability due to specific population focus.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Virtual Reality Interventions and Activities of Daily Living, Virtual Reality Interventions and Fruit and vegetable intake.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Explore more in Evidence Explorer

Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Virtual Reality Interventions improve activities of daily living?

Emerging Evidence

Virtual Reality Interventions appears to improve activities of daily living.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Daily step count

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach improve fruit and vegetable intake?

Emerging Evidence

VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach appears to improve fruit and vegetable intake.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Fruit and vegetable intake

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

What evidence is available on VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach and reduction in red meat intake?

Emerging Evidence

VA|PREVENTION project web application with virtual human coach appears to reduce reduction in red meat intake.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Reduction in red meat intake

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.