- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Peer-support lifestyle program reduces diabetes risk factors but not diabetes incidence in high-risk Indians
Last updated June 11, 2026
Key finding
greater reduction in IDRS score (mean difference: -1.50 points, p=0.022)
This cluster-randomized trial tested a community-based peer-support lifestyle program in 1,007 high-risk Indian adults. The program improved diet, reduced alcohol use, and enhanced physical functioning, but the 14.9% vs 17.1% reduction in diabetes incidence was not statistically significant.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This cluster-randomized trial tested a community-based peer-support lifestyle program in 1,007 high-risk Indian adults. The program improved diet, reduced alcohol use, and enhanced physical functioning, but the 14.9% vs 17.1% reduction in diabetes incidence was not statistically significant.
Clinical relevance
This study demonstrates that a peer-led, community-based lifestyle program can be delivered at very low cost (US$22.50/participant) in a low- and middle-income country setting. While the diabetes incidence reduction was not statistically significant, the improvements in risk factors suggest potential for diabetes prevention at scale with longer-term follow-up.
Keep in mind
Diabetes incidence reduction was not statistically significant No adjustment for multiple comparisons (increases type I error risk) 24-month follow-up may be insufficient to detect diabetes prevention effects
Main Effects
Diabetes incidence: ↓ non-significant (14.9% vs 17.1%, RR 0.88, p=0.36)
IDRS score: ↓ -1.50 points (p=0.022)
Alcohol use: ↓ RR 0.77 (p=0.018)
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Peer-support lifestyle program and Alcohol use, Fruit and vegetable intake, Indian Diabetes Risk Score, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Peer-support lifestyle program
Primary outcomes
- Alcohol use
- Fruit and vegetable intake
- Indian Diabetes Risk Score
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
3
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
294
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 5 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Quality of Life Outcomes
Related evidence
Evidence relationship
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Diabetes Incidence and Prevention
Save evidence
Evidence topic
Prediabetes
Save evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Fruit and vegetable intake
Peer-support lifestyle program → Fruit and vegetable intake
Peer-support lifestyle program → Fruit and vegetable intake
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Indian Diabetes Risk Score
Peer-support lifestyle program → Indian Diabetes Risk Score
Peer-support lifestyle program → Indian Diabetes Risk Score
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Quality of life
Peer-support lifestyle program → Quality of life
Peer-support lifestyle program → Quality of life
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Type 2 diabetes incidence
Peer-support lifestyle program → Type 2 diabetes incidence
Peer-support lifestyle program → Type 2 diabetes incidence
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 55
- Slightly Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Keep in Mind
- Diabetes incidence reduction was not statistically significant No adjustment for multiple comparisons (increases type I error risk) 24-month follow-up may be insufficient to detect diabetes prevention effects
Between the Lines
- Diabetes incidence reduction was not statistically significant No adjustment for multiple comparisons (increases type I error risk) 24-month follow-up may be insufficient to detect diabetes prevention effects
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Alcohol use, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Fruit and vegetable intake.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Alcohol use
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Fruit and vegetable intake
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Quality of Life Outcomes
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Alcohol use Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Alcohol use
Measures Alcohol use as a key outcome.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs Evidence Hub
All studies on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs
Contributes to Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs evidence base.
Fruit and vegetable intake Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Fruit and vegetable intake
Measures Fruit and vegetable intake as a key outcome.
Quality of Life Outcomes Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Quality of Life Outcomes
Measures Quality of Life Outcomes as a key outcome.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on Peer-support lifestyle program and Alcohol use
1 results
All studies on Peer-support lifestyle program and Fruit and vegetable intake
1 results
All studies on Peer-support lifestyle program
1 results
All studies measuring Alcohol use
1 results
All studies measuring Fruit and vegetable intake
1 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve quality of life outcomes?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Quality of Life Outcomes.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Quality of life
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 10 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve diabetes incidence and prevention?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Diabetes Incidence and Prevention.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Type 2 diabetes incidence
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Peer-support lifestyle program improve alcohol use?
Peer-support lifestyle program appears to improve Alcohol use.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Alcohol use
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Peer-support lifestyle program improve fruit and vegetable intake?
Peer-support lifestyle program appears to improve Fruit and vegetable intake.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Fruit and vegetable intake
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
