Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

mHealth social support improves diabetes self-management

Key finding

Both groups showed significant HbA1c level improvements (combined group change=1.36%, SD 2.42% mg/dL; 95% CI 0.87-1.83; P <.001)

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a mobile health social support program for diabetes management in emergency department patients, finding significant improvements in HbA1c levels.

Evidence strength

Moderate confidence

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Long-Term (1–5 y)

High bias
Last updated July 8, 2026

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

Population

Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes

Intervention

mHealth social support program (Family and Friends Network Support)

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Long-Term (1–5 y)

Primary outcome

HbA1c

Comparator

Non-mHealth social support program

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a mobile health social support program for diabetes management in emergency department patients, finding significant improvements in HbA1c levels.

Clinical relevance

Improving diabetes self-management is crucial for reducing complications and enhancing quality of life. This study suggests that mobile health interventions can be beneficial, especially for newly diagnosed patients, potentially guiding future diabetes care strategies.

Keep in mind

The study may lack generalizability due to its specific population in emergency departments. Effectiveness of the mHealth intervention remains unclear for the broader diabetes population. Potential unmeasured confounders could influence outcomes.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Naomi C, Amit D, Cynthia B, et al. Social Support mHealth Intervention to Improve Diabetes Self-Management in Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Phase-III Trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2025;10:e56934. doi:10.2196/56934

Save this study and add notes to your research library.

Main Effects

Both groups showed significant improvements in HbA1c levels (combined change=1.36%, p<0.001).

No significant group difference in HbA1c levels at 6 months (mean difference=0.14%, p=0.87).

Newly diagnosed patients in the mHealth group improved glycemic control more than the standard group (difference of 1.96%, p=0.04).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Peer-support lifestyle program and HbA1c, Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients, Safety events.

Primary intervention

Peer-support lifestyle program

Primary outcomes

  • HbA1c
  • Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients
  • Safety events

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

3
Evidence pairs
3
Relationships
2
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

2

Related topics

3

Evidence pairs

204

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

StrongDecrease

HbA1c

Peer-support lifestyle program → HbA1c

Peer-support lifestyle program → HbA1c

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseGlycemic Control
Unlock full evidence details
StrongDecrease

Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients

Peer-support lifestyle program → Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients

Peer-support lifestyle program → Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseGlycemic Control
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

Safety events

Peer-support lifestyle program → Safety events

Peer-support lifestyle program → Safety events

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeSafety
Unlock full evidence details

Unlock full evidence analysis

Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Significant HbA1c improvement of 1.36% in both groups.
  • No significant difference in HbA1c at 6 months (0.14%, p=0.87).
  • 1.96% greater improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients in the mHealth group.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Patients with diabetes treated in emergency departments.
  • Individuals newly diagnosed with diabetes.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to all diabetes patients outside emergency settings.
  • Further research is needed to clarify the long-term effectiveness of mHealth interventions.
  • The study did not measure all potential confounding factors that could affect outcomes.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study may lack generalizability due to its specific population in emergency departments.
  • Effectiveness of the mHealth intervention remains unclear for the broader diabetes population.
  • Potential unmeasured confounders could influence outcomes.

Unlock Full Analysis

Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve HbA1c?

Emerging Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.

ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 24 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
24 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Peer-support lifestyle program improve improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients?

Emerging Evidence

Peer-support lifestyle program appears to improve Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Peer-support lifestyle program affect safety events?

Limited Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Peer-support lifestyle program for Safety events.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Safety events

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 31.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.