HbA1c
Peer-support lifestyle program → HbA1c
Peer-support lifestyle program → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Key finding
Both groups showed significant HbA1c level improvements (combined group change=1.36%, SD 2.42% mg/dL; 95% CI 0.87-1.83; P <.001)
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a mobile health social support program for diabetes management in emergency department patients, finding significant improvements in HbA1c levels.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
mHealth social support program (Family and Friends Network Support)
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Primary outcome
HbA1c
Comparator
Non-mHealth social support program
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a mobile health social support program for diabetes management in emergency department patients, finding significant improvements in HbA1c levels.
Improving diabetes self-management is crucial for reducing complications and enhancing quality of life. This study suggests that mobile health interventions can be beneficial, especially for newly diagnosed patients, potentially guiding future diabetes care strategies.
The study may lack generalizability due to its specific population in emergency departments. Effectiveness of the mHealth intervention remains unclear for the broader diabetes population. Potential unmeasured confounders could influence outcomes.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Naomi C, Amit D, Cynthia B, et al. Social Support mHealth Intervention to Improve Diabetes Self-Management in Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Phase-III Trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2025;10:e56934. doi:10.2196/56934
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Both groups showed significant improvements in HbA1c levels (combined change=1.36%, p<0.001).
No significant group difference in HbA1c levels at 6 months (mean difference=0.14%, p=0.87).
Newly diagnosed patients in the mHealth group improved glycemic control more than the standard group (difference of 1.96%, p=0.04).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Peer-support lifestyle program and HbA1c, Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients, Safety events.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Peer-support lifestyle program
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
3
Evidence pairs
204
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Peer-support lifestyle program → HbA1c
Peer-support lifestyle program → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Peer-support lifestyle program → Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients
Peer-support lifestyle program → Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients
Evidence profile
Peer-support lifestyle program → Safety events
Peer-support lifestyle program → Safety events
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 24 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Peer-support lifestyle program appears to improve Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Improvement in glycemic control for newly diagnosed patients
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 49.1 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Peer-support lifestyle program for Safety events.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Safety events
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 31.5 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.