Supporting evidence

Continuous glucose monitoring × Time in range

Authoritative support
6
Available studies
6
Unavailable support
0

Available supporting studies

Study 1 · Included

CGM enhances glycaemic control in chronic pancreatitis diabetes.

Rct

Comparison
Participants received 50 days of continuous glucose monitoring. · Participants received 50 days of self monitoring of blood glucose.
Duration / follow-up
1 weeks

Relevant effects

Mean difference

7.46 · 0.01

Mean difference

6.55 · 0.04

Mean difference

0.91 · 0.04

View research →

Study 2 · Limited

Community pharmacy-led diabetes management improves glycemic control in adults with T2DM

Duration / follow-up
12 weeks

Relevant effect

Absolute change

5.8 · 0.001

View research →

Study 3 · Included

Continuous glucose monitoring may improve diabetes management in rural Malawi

Rct

Comparison
Participants in this arm used Dexcom G6 for continuous glucose monitoring. · Participants in this arm performed home blood glucose monitoring using safe accu glucose meters.
Duration / follow-up
13 weeks

Relevant effect

Percent change

63.8

View research →

Study 4 · Limited

Dexcom ONE use significantly reduces HbA1c in diabetes patients.

Comparison
Adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes using Dexcom ONE CGM for 6 months. · Participants received usual diabetes care during the study.
Duration / follow-up
26 weeks

Relevant effect

Percent change

9

View research →

Study 5 · Limited

Education Model Improves Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes

Comparison
A multidisciplinary therapeutic education program integrated into routine clinical care for adults with type 1 diabetes.
Duration / follow-up
39 weeks
View research →

Study 6 · Included

Telemedicine improves glucose control in nursing home residents with diabetes.

Rct

Comparison
Patients performed CGM monitoring and insulin doses were adjusted remotely by a specialist. · Patients performed their usual capillary blood glucose monitoring; insulin doses were adjusted by their healthcare providers.
Duration / follow-up
12 weeks

Relevant effects

Mean difference

10.3 · 0.01

Mean difference

3.1 · 0.007

Mean difference

0 · 0.845

Mean difference

1.5 · 0.007

View research →