Resumen de Investigación
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Education Model Improves Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes

Última actualización 12 de julio de 2026

Key finding

HbA1c showed a statistically significant reduction, decreasing from 7.70 ± 1.10% to 7.45 ± 0.91% following the intervention (p = 0.003).

Multidisciplinary hybrid education integrated with continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

Multidisciplinary hybrid education integrated with continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Clinical relevance

This study evaluated Multidisciplinary hybrid education integrated with continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Keep in mind

Limitations were not clearly described in the extracted text.

Published in

Referencia de la Revista

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Carmen AR, Ana P, Ana C, et al. A Multidisciplinary Hybrid Education Model Integrated with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Healthcare. 2026;14(2):198. doi:10.3390/healthcare14020198

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Continuous glucose monitoring and Change in Clarke score, HbA1c, Mean glucose levels measured during the intervention, and 3 more.

Primary intervention

Continuous glucose monitoring

Primary outcomes

  • Change in Clarke score
  • HbA1c
  • Mean glucose levels measured during the intervention

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

6
Evidence pairs
6
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 72

3

Related topics

6

Evidence pairs

1024

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 6 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Agrega evidencia relacionada a tu Evidence Tracker

Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.

Evidencia principal

Relación de evidencia

Insulin Delivery Systems and HbA1c

Evidencia relacionada

Relación de evidencia

Insulin Delivery Systems and CGM Time in Range

Guardar evidencia

Relación de evidencia

Insulin Delivery Systems and Quality of Life Outcomes

Guardar evidencia

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Change in Clarke score

Continuous glucose monitoring → Change in Clarke score

Continuous glucose monitoring → Change in Clarke score

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

Continuous glucose monitoring → HbA1c

Continuous glucose monitoring → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
86
Strong
ImpactScore™
83
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
89
consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 9 estudios
Add to Evidence Tracker

Mean glucose levels measured during the intervention

Continuous glucose monitoring → Mean glucose levels measured during the intervention

Continuous glucose monitoring → Mean glucose levels measured during the intervention

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
100
consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 2 estudios
Add to Evidence Tracker

Quality of life

Continuous glucose monitoring → Quality of life

Continuous glucose monitoring → Quality of life

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

Continuous glucose monitoring → Time in range

Continuous glucose monitoring → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
86
Strong
ImpactScore™
81
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
75
consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 8 estudios
Add to Evidence Tracker

Treatment satisfaction

Continuous glucose monitoring → Treatment satisfaction

Continuous glucose monitoring → Treatment satisfaction

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Insulin Delivery Systems and HbA1c, Insulin Delivery Systems and CGM Time in Range.

Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Insulin Delivery Systems improve HbA1c?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems appears to improve HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 85.9 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 17 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
17 supporting studiesUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Insulin Delivery Systems improve cgm time in range?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems may improve CGM Time in Range.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time in range

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 85.5 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

  2. 2

    Mean glucose levels measured during the intervention

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
27 supporting studiesUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Insulin Delivery Systems improve quality of life outcomes?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems may improve Quality of Life Outcomes.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Quality of life

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
8 supporting studiesUpdated: Aug 2026

Does Insulin Delivery Systems improve treatment experience?

Moderate Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems appears to improve Treatment Experience.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Treatment satisfaction

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a small number of supporting studies and should be interpreted cautiously.

Limitations

  • Only a small number of supporting studies are available.
  • Population details are unavailable.
2 supporting studiesUpdated: Aug 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

Sin anuncios. Sin rastreo.

Centrada en la evidencia, no en la publicidad.

Segura y privada

Tus datos siempre están protegidos.

Siempre al día

Se agregan nuevos estudios todos los días.