GLP-1 Receptor Agonists → Body Weight
Medications
- EvidenceScore™
- 87
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 72
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 88
- consistent
Last updated May 6, 2026
Key finding
In adults with type 1 diabetes, obesity, and automated insulin delivery, semaglutide lowered total, bolus, and basal insulin needs over 26 weeks while early dose reductions were only partly explained by weight loss.
This study looked at how semaglutide changed insulin needs in adults with type 1 diabetes and obesity who used automated insulin delivery. Over 26 weeks, semaglutide lowered total insulin needs, especially bolus insulin, while also improving weight and glucose time in range without a clear rise in severe hypoglycemia.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
In adults with type 1 diabetes, obesity, and automated insulin delivery, semaglutide lowered total, bolus, and basal insulin needs over 26 weeks while early dose reductions were only partly explained by weight loss.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Karakus KE, Akturk HK, Kruger D, et al. Effect of Semaglutide on Insulin Dose Reduction in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes and Obesity Using Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: ADJUST-T1D Post Hoc Analysis. Diabetes Care. 2026;49(5):718-723. doi:10.2337/dc25-2249
Total daily insulin dose ↓ by 22.6% at 26 weeks with semaglutide
Bolus insulin dose ↓ more than basal insulin dose over time
Body weight ↓ and time in range ↑ in the parent trial results
Severe hypoglycemia ↔ and diabetic ketoacidosis events were not reported
These findings apply most directly to adults aged 18 to 65 with type 1 diabetes, obesity, and access to FDA-approved automated insulin delivery systems. They may be most relevant to people considering adjunct semaglutide while already receiving structured insulin management and continuous glucose monitoring.
This paper focused on insulin-dose patterns within a randomized trial and was not designed as a broad real-world effectiveness study. The participants had obesity and used automated insulin delivery, so the findings may not translate to people without obesity, those using injections alone, or settings without close follow-up. Because the analysis was post hoc, the results are best used to guide careful dose adjustment rather than as a stand-alone practice rule.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Body Weight, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and HbA1c.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Medications
Medications
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Body Weight
Measures Body Weight as a key outcome.
All studies on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Contributes to GLP-1 Receptor Agonists evidence base.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
9 results
11 results
9 results
9 results
11 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists has been studied in relation to Body Weight, but the direction of effect is unclear.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Body weight
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 86.7 | unknown | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists has been studied in relation to HbA1c, but the direction of effect is unclear.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 86.5 | unknown | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 11 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.