Digital Health ToolsBehavioral Intervention
Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Text messaging may help increase physical activity in adults with type 2 diabetes

Last updated May 16, 2026

Key finding

Text messaging appears acceptable for promoting activity in Saudi adults with diabetes, but effectiveness is unclear.

This study tested text messages designed to help Saudi adults with type 2 diabetes become more physically active. Participants received two text messages per week in Arabic for 6 weeks. The study included 52 adults (average age 55 years) from diabetes clinics in Saudi Arabia. The texts were culturally tailored to address local barriers like high temperatures and cultural considerations. Participants reported increased physical activity and felt more confident about exercising. However, this was a small study without a comparison group, so we can't be sure the text messages caused these changes. Physical activity was self-reported, not objectively measured.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

non-randomized clinical trial (non-RCT or NRCT)

Follow-up

Long-Term (> 12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

Text messaging appears acceptable for promoting activity in Saudi adults with diabetes, but effectiveness is unclear.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Blake H, Alsahli MJ, Chaplin WJ, Konstantinidis STh. The ActiveText@T2D text messaging behavioural intervention to increase physical activity in adults with type 2 diabetes: A prospective single-arm feasibility trial. PLOS Digit Health. 2025;4(7):e0000953. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000953

Main Effects

Physical activity → ↑ (self-reported increase)

Exercise confidence → ↑ (moderate improvement)

Barriers to activity → ↓ (reported decrease)

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Text messaging appears feasible and acceptable to Saudi adults with type 2 diabetes and their healthcare providers.
  • Participants reported increased physical activity and improved exercise confidence, though these findings need confirmation in a study with a comparison group.
  • The intervention revealed a gap in care—physical activity is not consistently discussed during diabetes consultations.
who this applies

Who this applies to

Adults with type 2 diabetes in Saudi Arabia who own mobile phones

keep in mind

Keep in Mind

Without a comparison group, the observed changes could be due to other factors like seasonal variation or simply being in a study.

between the lines

Between the Lines

  • No comparison group to show if texts caused changes
  • Small study with only 52 participants
  • Physical activity was self-reported, not measured objectively
  • Most participants were urban and well-educated

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Physical Activity Levels.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve physical activity levels?

Emerging Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs has been studied in relation to Physical Activity Levels, but the direction of effect is unclear.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | unknown | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.