- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Cocoa supplementation may improve diabetic neuropathy symptoms in type 2 diabetes.
Última actualización 6 de julio de 2026
Key finding
In the cocoa group, the TCSS decreased by 2.63 points.
This study investigated the effects of cocoa supplementation on diabetic neuropathy in individuals with Type 2 Diabetes. Results indicated no significant differences between cocoa and placebo groups.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda este estudio en tu Evidence Tracker para encontrarlo facilmente cuando lo necesites.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the effects of cocoa supplementation on diabetic neuropathy in individuals with Type 2 Diabetes. Results indicated no significant differences between cocoa and placebo groups.
Clinical relevance
Understanding the effectiveness of dietary interventions like cocoa supplementation is crucial for managing diabetic neuropathy. If cocoa had shown significant benefits, it could have offered a simple dietary option for patients. However, the lack of significant findings indicates that further research is needed to explore effective treatments for this condition.
Keep in mind
No significant differences were found between groups. Sample size and demographic characteristics were not specified. The study's findings may not be generalizable to all populations with Type 2 Diabetes.
Published in
Referencia de la Revista
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Rebeca K, Gabriela G, Luisa FS, et al. The Effect of Cocoa Supplementation on Diabetic Neuropathy in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025;26(16):8033. doi:10.3390/ijms26168033
Efectos Principales
The TCSS decreased by 2.63 points in the cocoa group versus 1.84 points in the placebo group (p > 0.05).
The BEST score decreased by 1.45 points in the cocoa group compared to a 2.21 point decrease in the placebo group (p > 0.05).
Quality-of-Life questionnaire scores decreased by 9.2 points in the cocoa group, with no significant difference from the placebo group (p = 0.501).
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Cocoa supplementation and BEST score, Quality of life, Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS).
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Cocoa supplementation
Primary outcomes
- BEST score
- Quality of life
- Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
0
Related topics
3
Evidence pairs
0
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 0 direct semantic evidence topics
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)
Cocoa supplementation → Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)
Cocoa supplementation → Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Build your personal Evidence Workspace
Create a free account to save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Today's Activity
Your Evidence Workspace
Saved this study
Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.
Evidence Tracker
12 tracked topics
Saved Studies
48 studies
Research Notes
Coming Soon
Weekly Evidence Digest
Coming Soon
La Evidencia Sugiere
- Cocoa group showed a TCSS decrease of 2.63 points, but not significant.
- BEST score decreased by 1.45 points in cocoa group, also not significant.
- Quality-of-Life scores decreased by 9.2 points in cocoa group, with no significant difference.
A quién se aplica
- Adults diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Individuals experiencing diabetic neuropathy symptoms.
Tener en Cuenta
- The study did not find significant benefits from cocoa supplementation.
- Results may not apply to all individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Further research is needed to explore effective treatments for diabetic neuropathy.
Entre Líneas
- No significant differences were found between groups.
- Sample size and demographic characteristics were not specified.
- The study's findings may not be generalizable to all populations with Type 2 Diabetes.
Save this study
Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.
Today's Activity
Your Evidence Workspace
Saved this study
Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.
Evidence Tracker
12 tracked topics
Saved Studies
48 studies
Research Notes
Coming Soon
Weekly Evidence Digest
Coming Soon
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Cocoa supplementation and BEST score, Cocoa supplementation and Quality of Life Outcomes.
Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas
Explore in Evidence ArchiveThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Cocoa supplementation → BEST score
Supplements
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Incluido en estas colecciones de evidencia
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
BEST score Evidence Hub
All studies measuring BEST score
Measures BEST score as a key outcome.
Cocoa supplementation Evidence Hub
All studies on Cocoa supplementation
Contributes to Cocoa supplementation evidence base.
Quality of Life Outcomes Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Quality of Life Outcomes
Measures Quality of Life Outcomes as a key outcome.
Recent Diabetes Research
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Explora más en el archivo de evidencia
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
All studies on Cocoa supplementation and BEST score
1 results
All studies on Cocoa supplementation and Quality of life
1 results
All studies on Cocoa supplementation
1 results
All studies measuring BEST score
1 results
All studies measuring Quality of life
1 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Cocoa supplementation improve best score?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Cocoa supplementation for BEST score.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
BEST score
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Cocoa supplementation improve quality of life?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Cocoa supplementation for Quality of life.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Quality of life
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Cocoa supplementation improve toronto clinical scoring system (tcss)?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Cocoa supplementation for Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS).
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Explore in archive
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.