Última actualización 8 de julio de 2026
Key finding
The systolic blood pressure (SBP) of the two APP groups was significantly lower than that of the other groups (P <.05).
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a diabetes app for blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. It found that while the app did not significantly improve HbA1c or BMI, it was associated with lower systolic blood pressure and high participant satisfaction.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a diabetes app for blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. It found that while the app did not significantly improve HbA1c or BMI, it was associated with lower systolic blood pressure and high participant satisfaction.
These findings highlight the potential of digital health tools in managing chronic conditions like diabetes. Although the app did not significantly improve blood glucose levels, its ability to lower blood pressure and achieve high user satisfaction suggests it could be a valuable tool for patients and healthcare providers in managing type 2 diabetes.
The study did not measure long-term effects of the app. Sample size and characteristics may limit generalizability. No significant changes in key diabetes management metrics were observed.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Hongxia T, Huiwen T, Jihong Z, et al. Effectiveness and Applicability of a Diabetes APP for Blood Glucose Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2025;16:1420578. doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1420578
No significant difference in HbA1c attainment rate among groups (P >.05).
Systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the app groups by -6.5 mmHg (P <.05).
No significant difference in BMI among groups (P >.05).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Instructional WhatsApp group for diabetes self-care, Telephone Follow-Up, Usual care and Participants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP, Systolic blood pressure, Blood glucose, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Instructional WhatsApp group for diabetes self-care
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
7
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
1806
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.
Evidencia principal
Relación de evidencia
Evidencia relacionada
Tema de evidencia
Guardar evidencia
Tema de evidencia
Guardar evidencia
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Instructional WhatsApp group for diabetes self-care → Participants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP
Instructional WhatsApp group for diabetes self-care → Participants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP
Instructional WhatsApp group for diabetes self-care → Systolic blood pressure
Instructional WhatsApp group for diabetes self-care → Systolic blood pressure
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Usual care and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies on Usual care
Contributes to Usual care evidence base.
All studies on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs
Contributes to Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs evidence base.
All studies measuring Blood Pressure
Measures Blood Pressure as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
12 results
5 results
12 results
5 results
12 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Blood Pressure.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Systolic blood pressure
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Usual care may improve HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 85.9 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Usual care for BMI.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
BMI
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Instructional WhatsApp group for diabetes self-care appears to improve Participants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Participants' satisfaction evaluation of the APP
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Centrada en la evidencia, no en la publicidad.
Tus datos siempre están protegidos.
Se agregan nuevos estudios todos los días.
