Última actualización 12 de julio de 2026
Key finding
MARD for abdomen sensors was 9.4%.
This study evaluated the True Vie I3 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in adults with diabetes, finding high agreement rates and minimal pain during sensor use.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Short-Term (≤3 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the True Vie I3 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in adults with diabetes, finding high agreement rates and minimal pain during sensor use.
These findings are significant as they suggest that the True Vie I3 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System can provide reliable glucose monitoring for adults with diabetes, which is crucial for effective diabetes management. High accuracy and minimal discomfort can enhance patient adherence to monitoring, ultimately improving glycemic control and reducing complications associated with diabetes.
The study did not provide a detailed description of the participant demographics. Sample size and generalizability to broader populations were not specified. Effectiveness claims were marked as unclear for several outcomes.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Nina J, Manuela L, Sükrü &, et al. Evaluation of the True Vie I3 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Adults with Diabetes. Diabetes Therapy. 2025;17(2):287-299. doi:10.1007/s13300-025-01832-6
MARD for abdomen sensors was 9.4%, indicating low error in glucose readings.
Agreement rates for abdomen sensors reached 95.5%, showing high accuracy.
Sensor attachment rate for abdomen sensors was 100%, demonstrating excellent usability.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Continuous glucose monitoring and Agreement Rates for Arm Sensors, Agreement rates for abdomen sensors, Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) for Abdomen Sensors, and 5 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Continuous glucose monitoring
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
8
Evidence pairs
127
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.
Evidencia principal
Tema de evidencia
matched_intervention
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Continuous glucose monitoring → Agreement rates for abdomen sensors
Continuous glucose monitoring → Agreement rates for abdomen sensors
Continuous glucose monitoring → Agreement Rates for Arm Sensors
Continuous glucose monitoring → Agreement Rates for Arm Sensors
Continuous glucose monitoring → Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) for Abdomen Sensors
Continuous glucose monitoring → Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) for Abdomen Sensors
Continuous glucose monitoring → Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) for Arm Sensors
Continuous glucose monitoring → Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) for Arm Sensors
Continuous glucose monitoring → Pain during insertion
Continuous glucose monitoring → Pain during insertion
Continuous glucose monitoring → Pain during removal
Continuous glucose monitoring → Pain during removal
Continuous glucose monitoring → Safety events
Continuous glucose monitoring → Safety events
Continuous glucose monitoring → Sensor attachment rate for arm sensors
Continuous glucose monitoring → Sensor attachment rate for arm sensors
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Insulin Delivery Systems and Agreement rates for abdomen sensors, Insulin Delivery Systems and Agreement Rates for Arm Sensors.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Devices & Technology
Devices & Technology
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Agreement rates for abdomen sensors
Measures Agreement rates for abdomen sensors as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Agreement Rates for Arm Sensors
Measures Agreement Rates for Arm Sensors as a key outcome.
All studies on Insulin Delivery Systems
Contributes to Insulin Delivery Systems evidence base.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Continuous glucose monitoring appears to improve Agreement Rates for Arm Sensors.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Agreement Rates for Arm Sensors
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Continuous glucose monitoring appears to improve Agreement rates for abdomen sensors.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Agreement rates for abdomen sensors
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Continuous glucose monitoring appears to improve Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) for Abdomen Sensors.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) for Abdomen Sensors
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Continuous glucose monitoring appears to improve Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) for Arm Sensors.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) for Arm Sensors
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
