Última actualización 29 de agosto de 2026
Key finding
The primary outcome variable is the change in MAGE at 15 weeks of follow-up.
This study assessed the efficacy of various physical exercise modalities on glycaemic control in adults with prediabetes, with unclear effectiveness results.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study assessed the efficacy of various physical exercise modalities on glycaemic control in adults with prediabetes, with unclear effectiveness results.
Understanding how different exercise modalities influence glycaemic control is crucial for developing effective lifestyle interventions for individuals with prediabetes. This knowledge can help tailor exercise recommendations to improve health outcomes and potentially prevent the progression to type 2 diabetes.
Effectiveness of interventions remains unclear due to insufficient data. The study may have limited generalizability due to specific population characteristics. Potential confounding factors were not fully addressed in the analysis.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Aina MG, Miquel B, Paula O, et al. To assess the efficacy of different modalities and frequencies of physical exercise on glycaemic control in adults with prediabetes. Metabolites. 2022;12(12):1286. doi:10.3390/metabo12121286
The study assessed the change in MAGE at 15 weeks but found unclear effectiveness.
Secondary outcomes included fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c, with unclear results.
Other measured outcomes included quality of life and sleep quality, also showing unclear effectiveness.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Aerobic exercise and Change in body composition after 12 weeks of treatment, Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), HbA1c, and 7 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Aerobic exercise
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
4
Related topics
10
Evidence pairs
994
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.
Evidencia principal
Relación de evidencia
Evidencia relacionada
Relación de evidencia
Guardar evidencia
Relación de evidencia
Guardar evidencia
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Aerobic exercise → Change in body composition after 12 weeks of treatment
Aerobic exercise → Change in body composition after 12 weeks of treatment
Aerobic exercise → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Aerobic exercise → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Aerobic exercise → Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE)
Aerobic exercise → Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE)
Aerobic exercise → REV-ERBα gene expression
Aerobic exercise → REV-ERBα gene expression
Aerobic exercise → Systolic blood pressure
Aerobic exercise → Systolic blood pressure
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Aerobic Exercise and HbA1c, Aerobic Exercise and Fasting Glucose.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Physical Activity
Physical Activity
Physical Activity
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies on Aerobic Exercise
Contributes to Aerobic Exercise evidence base.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Fasting Glucose
Measures Fasting Glucose as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Quality of Life Outcomes
Measures Quality of Life Outcomes as a key outcome.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
5 results
3 results
5 results
5 results
3 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Aerobic Exercise may improve HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 81.6 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 8 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Aerobic Exercise appears to improve Fasting Glucose.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 8 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Aerobic Exercise appears to improve Body Composition.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Change in body composition after 12 weeks of treatment
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 5 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Aerobic Exercise may improve CGM Time in Range.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Time in range
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Centrada en la evidencia, no en la publicidad.
Tus datos siempre están protegidos.
Se agregan nuevos estudios todos los días.
