Resumen de Investigación
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

SugarVita may improve HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes

Última actualización 12 de septiembre de 2026

Key finding

HbA1c decreased significantly within the intervention group (median 73.0 to median 64.5 mmol/mol; P = 0.007).

This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of SugarVita, a serious game for diabetes self-management, compared to standard care. The intervention group showed a significant reduction in HbA1c levels.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of SugarVita, a serious game for diabetes self-management, compared to standard care. The intervention group showed a significant reduction in HbA1c levels.

Clinical relevance

The findings highlight the potential of using serious games like SugarVita as a complementary tool for diabetes management. With a significant reduction in HbA1c, such interventions may improve clinical outcomes for patients, although further research is needed to confirm these benefits across broader populations.

Keep in mind

Small sample size limits generalizability. No significant changes in knowledge, self-confidence, or self-management. Results may not apply to all diabetes populations.

Published in

Referencia de la Revista

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Edouard R, Elma C-VDM, Ryan DV, et al. Effects of SugarVita, a Serious Game for Diabetes Self-Management: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2026;11:e99345. doi:10.2196/99345

Efectos Principales

HbA1c decreased significantly in the intervention group (median 73.0 to 64.5 mmol/mol; P = 0.007).

No significant differences were found in diabetes knowledge between the groups.

No significant differences were found in self-confidence between the groups.

No significant differences were found in self-management between the groups.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to SugarVita plus standard care and Diabetes knowledge, HbA1c, Self-confidence, and 1 more.

Primary intervention

SugarVita plus standard care

Primary outcomes

  • Diabetes knowledge
  • HbA1c
  • Self-confidence

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

4
Evidence pairs
4
Relationships
1
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 63

1

Related topics

4

Evidence pairs

603

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 4 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Agrega evidencia relacionada a tu Evidence Tracker

Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.

Evidencia principal

Tema de evidencia

HbA1c Reduction

matched_outcome

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Diabetes knowledge

SugarVita plus standard care → Diabetes knowledge

SugarVita plus standard care → Diabetes knowledge

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

SugarVita plus standard care → HbA1c

SugarVita plus standard care → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Self-confidence

SugarVita plus standard care → Self-confidence

SugarVita plus standard care → Self-confidence

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Self-management scores

SugarVita plus standard care → Self-management scores

SugarVita plus standard care → Self-management scores

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

La Evidencia Sugiere

  • HbA1c decreased by 8.5 mmol/mol in the intervention group (P = 0.007).
  • No significant improvement in diabetes knowledge was observed.
  • No significant improvement in self-management skills was noted.
who this applies

A quién se aplica

  • Adults with diabetes seeking improved self-management strategies.
  • Individuals interested in gamified health interventions.
keep in mind

Tener en Cuenta

  • The study was a pilot trial, indicating preliminary findings.
  • Results may not be applicable to diverse diabetes populations.
  • Further research is needed to validate the effectiveness of SugarVita.
between the lines

Entre Líneas

  • Small sample size limits generalizability.
  • No significant changes in knowledge, self-confidence, or self-management.
  • Results may not apply to all diabetes populations.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on SugarVita plus standard care and Activities of Daily Living, SugarVita plus standard care and HbA1c.

Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does SugarVita plus standard care lower HbA1c?

Emerging Evidence

SugarVita plus standard care appears to lower HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does SugarVita plus standard care improve diabetes knowledge?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of SugarVita plus standard care for diabetes knowledge.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Diabetes knowledge

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does SugarVita plus standard care improve self-confidence?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of SugarVita plus standard care for self-confidence.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Self-confidence

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does SugarVita plus standard care improve self-management scores?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of SugarVita plus standard care for self-management scores.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Self-management scores

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

Sin anuncios. Sin rastreo.

Centrada en la evidencia, no en la publicidad.

Segura y privada

Tus datos siempre están protegidos.

Siempre al día

Se agregan nuevos estudios todos los días.