Última actualización 8 de julio de 2026
Key finding
At 6 months, the unadjusted mean HbA1c values were 7.38% for the intervention group and 7.98% for the control group (P < 0.001).
This study evaluated the impact of telemedicine-assisted structured self-monitoring of blood glucose on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements in HbA1c and other metrics.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda este estudio en tu Evidence Tracker para encontrarlo facilmente cuando lo necesites.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the impact of telemedicine-assisted structured self-monitoring of blood glucose on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes, finding significant improvements in HbA1c and other metrics.
Improving glycemic control is crucial for reducing the risk of diabetes-related complications. This study suggests that telemedicine can enhance self-monitoring practices, potentially leading to better health outcomes for individuals with type 2 diabetes.
The study may have limited generalizability due to specific population characteristics. Potential biases in self-reported measures could affect outcome validity. The duration of the study may not capture long-term effects.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Chen-Yu H, Jian Z, Xiao-Mei Y, et al. Telemedicine-assisted structured self-monitoring of blood glucose improves glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2023;23:182. doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02283-4
The intervention group had a 0.6% reduction in HbA1c (P < 0.001).
LBGI decreased by 0.5 in the intervention group (P = 0.03).
DMSQ score increased by 1.04 in the intervention group (P < 0.001).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring, Traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) and Blood glucose, Diabetes self-management behaviors, HbA1c.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
3
Related topics
6
Evidence pairs
370
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.
Evidencia principal
Tema de evidencia
matched_outcome
Evidencia relacionada
Tema de evidencia
Seguir evidencia
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring → Blood glucose
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring → Blood glucose
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring → Diabetes self-management behaviors
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring → Diabetes self-management behaviors
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring → HbA1c
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring → HbA1c
Traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) → Blood glucose
Traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) → Blood glucose
Traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) → Diabetes self-management behaviors
Traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) → Diabetes self-management behaviors
Create a free account to save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Today's Activity
Saved this study
Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.
Evidence Tracker
12 tracked topics
Saved Studies
48 studies
Research Notes
Coming Soon
Weekly Evidence Digest
Coming Soon
Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.
Today's Activity
Saved this study
Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.
Evidence Tracker
12 tracked topics
Saved Studies
48 studies
Research Notes
Coming Soon
Weekly Evidence Digest
Coming Soon
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring and HbA1c, Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring and Fasting Glucose.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies on Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring
Contributes to Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring evidence base.
All studies measuring Fasting Glucose
Measures Fasting Glucose as a key outcome.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
2 results
1 results
2 results
2 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring may improve HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring appears to improve Blood glucose.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Blood glucose
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Standard care with capillary blood glucose monitoring appears to improve Diabetes self-management behaviors.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Diabetes self-management behaviors
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) for Blood glucose.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Blood glucose
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.