Resumen de Investigación
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Text Messaging Program Shows Little Effect on Diabetes Risk Factors

Última actualización 7 de julio de 2026

Key finding

7/57 (12%) intervention and 6/56 (11%) control participants met the primary outcome (relative risk, 1.08; 95%CI, 0.63–1.85; p = 0.79).

This study evaluated a text messaging-based lifestyle support program for women with gestational diabetes. Results showed no significant differences in key health outcomes compared to a control group.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Guarda este estudio en tu Evidence Tracker para encontrarlo facilmente cuando lo necesites.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated a text messaging-based lifestyle support program for women with gestational diabetes. Results showed no significant differences in key health outcomes compared to a control group.

Clinical relevance

Understanding the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for women with gestational diabetes is crucial, as these programs aim to improve health outcomes for both mothers and their infants. The lack of significant findings suggests that alternative approaches may be needed to support this population effectively.

Keep in mind

Small sample sizes may limit the power of the study. No significant differences were found in key health outcomes. The generalizability of findings may be restricted to similar populations.

Published in

Referencia de la Revista

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Ngai WC, David S, Simone M, et al. Smart Mums with Smart Phones 2: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Text Messaging-Based Lifestyle Support Program for Women with Gestational Diabetes. Nutrients. 2024;16(6):820. doi:10.3390/nu16060820

Efectos Principales

12% of intervention participants met the healthy lifestyle outcome compared to 11% in the control group (RR 1.08, p = 0.79).

30% of intervention participants achieved weight goals versus 19% in the control group (RR 1.54, p = 0.17).

47% of intervention participants met physical activity goals compared to 63% in the control group (RR 0.72, p = 0.08).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Peer-support lifestyle program and BMI, Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals, Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week), and 7 more.

Primary intervention

Peer-support lifestyle program

Primary outcomes

  • BMI
  • Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals
  • Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

10
Evidence pairs
10
Relationships
5
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

5

Related topics

10

Evidence pairs

324

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 10 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 5 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Agrega evidencia relacionada a tu Evidence Tracker

Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.

Evidencia principal

Relación de evidencia

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index

Evidencia relacionada

Relación de evidencia

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Physical Activity Levels

Seguir evidencia

Tema de evidencia

Prediabetes

Seguir evidencia

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

BMI

Peer-support lifestyle program → BMI

Peer-support lifestyle program → BMI

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals

Peer-support lifestyle program → Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals

Peer-support lifestyle program → Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

Peer-support lifestyle program → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

Peer-support lifestyle program → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
75
Positive
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Proportion of participants meeting dietary goal

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants meeting dietary goal

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants meeting dietary goal

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Proportion of participants meeting weight goal

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants meeting weight goal

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants meeting weight goal

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Proportion of participants who had an OGTT performed by 12 weeks postpartum

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants who had an OGTT performed by 12 weeks postpartum

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants who had an OGTT performed by 12 weeks postpartum

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Proportion of participants with EPDS score ≥ 10

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants with EPDS score ≥ 10

Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants with EPDS score ≥ 10

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Total physical activity time in minutes per week

Peer-support lifestyle program → Total physical activity time in minutes per week

Peer-support lifestyle program → Total physical activity time in minutes per week

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Build your personal Evidence Workspace

Create a free account to save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

evidence suggest

La Evidencia Sugiere

  • No significant improvement in healthy lifestyle outcomes (RR 1.08, p = 0.79).
  • Weight goal achievement was higher in the intervention group but not statistically significant (RR 1.54, p = 0.17).
  • Physical activity goal achievement was lower in the intervention group (RR 0.72, p = 0.08).
who this applies

A quién se aplica

  • Women diagnosed with gestational diabetes.
  • Participants in lifestyle intervention studies.
keep in mind

Tener en Cuenta

  • Results may not apply to all demographics of women with gestational diabetes.
  • Further research is needed to explore more effective interventions.
  • The study's findings may not reflect long-term outcomes beyond the intervention period.
between the lines

Entre Líneas

  • Small sample sizes may limit the power of the study.
  • No significant differences were found in key health outcomes.
  • The generalizability of findings may be restricted to similar populations.

Save this study

Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Physical Activity Levels, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months.

Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas

Explore in Evidence Archive

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Incluido en estas colecciones de evidencia

Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.

Explora más en el archivo de evidencia

Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs affect body mass index?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Body Mass Index.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    BMI

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
11 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve physical activity levels?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Physical Activity Levels.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
5 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Peer-support lifestyle program improve composite of weight, physical activity, and dietary goals?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Peer-support lifestyle program for Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Peer-support lifestyle program improve proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Peer-support lifestyle program for Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.