- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Text Messaging Program Shows Little Effect on Diabetes Risk Factors
Última actualización 7 de julio de 2026
Key finding
7/57 (12%) intervention and 6/56 (11%) control participants met the primary outcome (relative risk, 1.08; 95%CI, 0.63–1.85; p = 0.79).
This study evaluated a text messaging-based lifestyle support program for women with gestational diabetes. Results showed no significant differences in key health outcomes compared to a control group.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda este estudio en tu Evidence Tracker para encontrarlo facilmente cuando lo necesites.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated a text messaging-based lifestyle support program for women with gestational diabetes. Results showed no significant differences in key health outcomes compared to a control group.
Clinical relevance
Understanding the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for women with gestational diabetes is crucial, as these programs aim to improve health outcomes for both mothers and their infants. The lack of significant findings suggests that alternative approaches may be needed to support this population effectively.
Keep in mind
Small sample sizes may limit the power of the study. No significant differences were found in key health outcomes. The generalizability of findings may be restricted to similar populations.
Published in
Referencia de la Revista
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Ngai WC, David S, Simone M, et al. Smart Mums with Smart Phones 2: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Text Messaging-Based Lifestyle Support Program for Women with Gestational Diabetes. Nutrients. 2024;16(6):820. doi:10.3390/nu16060820
Efectos Principales
12% of intervention participants met the healthy lifestyle outcome compared to 11% in the control group (RR 1.08, p = 0.79).
30% of intervention participants achieved weight goals versus 19% in the control group (RR 1.54, p = 0.17).
47% of intervention participants met physical activity goals compared to 63% in the control group (RR 0.72, p = 0.08).
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Peer-support lifestyle program and BMI, Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals, Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week), and 7 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Peer-support lifestyle program
Primary outcomes
- BMI
- Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals
- Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Primary intervention
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
5
Related topics
10
Evidence pairs
324
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 10 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 5 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Agrega evidencia relacionada a tu Evidence Tracker
Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.
Evidencia principal
Relación de evidencia
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index
Evidencia relacionada
Relación de evidencia
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Physical Activity Levels
Seguir evidencia
Tema de evidencia
Prediabetes
Seguir evidencia
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals
Peer-support lifestyle program → Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals
Peer-support lifestyle program → Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Peer-support lifestyle program → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
Peer-support lifestyle program → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
- ImpactScore™
- 75
- Positive
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ConsistencyScore™
- 35
- mixed
Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Proportion of participants meeting dietary goal
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants meeting dietary goal
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants meeting dietary goal
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Proportion of participants meeting weight goal
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants meeting weight goal
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants meeting weight goal
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Proportion of participants who had an OGTT performed by 12 weeks postpartum
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants who had an OGTT performed by 12 weeks postpartum
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants who had an OGTT performed by 12 weeks postpartum
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Proportion of participants with EPDS score ≥ 10
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants with EPDS score ≥ 10
Peer-support lifestyle program → Proportion of participants with EPDS score ≥ 10
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Total physical activity time in minutes per week
Peer-support lifestyle program → Total physical activity time in minutes per week
Peer-support lifestyle program → Total physical activity time in minutes per week
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Build your personal Evidence Workspace
Create a free account to save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Today's Activity
Your Evidence Workspace
Saved this study
Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.
Evidence Tracker
12 tracked topics
Saved Studies
48 studies
Research Notes
Coming Soon
Weekly Evidence Digest
Coming Soon
La Evidencia Sugiere
- No significant improvement in healthy lifestyle outcomes (RR 1.08, p = 0.79).
- Weight goal achievement was higher in the intervention group but not statistically significant (RR 1.54, p = 0.17).
- Physical activity goal achievement was lower in the intervention group (RR 0.72, p = 0.08).
A quién se aplica
- Women diagnosed with gestational diabetes.
- Participants in lifestyle intervention studies.
Tener en Cuenta
- Results may not apply to all demographics of women with gestational diabetes.
- Further research is needed to explore more effective interventions.
- The study's findings may not reflect long-term outcomes beyond the intervention period.
Entre Líneas
- Small sample sizes may limit the power of the study.
- No significant differences were found in key health outcomes.
- The generalizability of findings may be restricted to similar populations.
Save this study
Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.
Today's Activity
Your Evidence Workspace
Saved this study
Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.
Evidence Tracker
12 tracked topics
Saved Studies
48 studies
Research Notes
Coming Soon
Weekly Evidence Digest
Coming Soon
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Physical Activity Levels, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months.
Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas
Explore in Evidence ArchiveThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Physical Activity Levels
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- ImpactScore™
- 75
- Positive
- EvidenceScore™
- Moderate
- Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
- ConsistencyScore™
- 35
- mixed
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Proportion of participants meeting weight goal
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Incluido en estas colecciones de evidencia
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs Evidence Hub
All studies on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs
Contributes to Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs evidence base.
Physical Activity Levels Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Physical Activity Levels
Measures Physical Activity Levels as a key outcome.
Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months
Measures Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months as a key outcome.
Proportion of participants meeting weight goal Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Proportion of participants meeting weight goal
Measures Proportion of participants meeting weight goal as a key outcome.
Recent Diabetes Research
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Explora más en el archivo de evidencia
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
All studies on Peer-support lifestyle program and Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
2 results
All studies on Peer-support lifestyle program and Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months
1 results
All studies on Peer-support lifestyle program
2 results
All studies measuring Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
2 results
All studies measuring Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 6 months
1 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs affect body mass index?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Body Mass Index.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
BMI
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve physical activity levels?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Physical Activity Levels.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Peer-support lifestyle program improve composite of weight, physical activity, and dietary goals?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Peer-support lifestyle program for Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Composite of Weight, Physical Activity, and Dietary Goals
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Peer-support lifestyle program improve proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Peer-support lifestyle program for Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Proportion of participants breastfeeding at 1 month
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
- Consistency cannot yet be determined.
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in archive
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.