Resumen de Investigación
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Ticagrelor monotherapy reduces bleeding in diabetic ACS patients

Última actualización 6 de julio de 2026

Key finding

There was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between the two groups during 12 months of follow-up.

This study evaluated ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome, finding no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Long-Term (1–5 y)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Guarda este estudio en tu Evidence Tracker para encontrarlo facilmente cuando lo necesites.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome, finding no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events.

Clinical relevance

These findings are significant for clinicians managing diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome, as they suggest that switching to ticagrelor monotherapy may reduce bleeding risks without compromising cardiovascular safety. This could lead to more tailored treatment strategies that balance efficacy and safety.

Keep in mind

The study's sample size and population may limit generalizability. The follow-up period was only 12 months, which may not capture long-term outcomes. Effect sizes were unclear, limiting the strength of conclusions.

Published in

Referencia de la Revista

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Nour EMSI, Mohamed TMZ, Khaled AFAM, Khaled AF, Mina MAI. Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Diabetic Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2026;26:300. doi:10.1186/s12872-026-05708-w

Efectos Principales

No significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events between ticagrelor monotherapy and dual therapy (p-value: null).

Ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with a decrease in overall bleeding events, particularly mild bleeding.

Rates of moderate or severe bleeding were comparable between both treatment groups.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Aspirin, Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT and Bleeding events, Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization).

Primary intervention

Aspirin

Primary outcomes

  • Bleeding events
  • Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

4
Evidence pairs
4
Relationships
1
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 63

1

Related topics

4

Evidence pairs

39

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 4 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Agrega evidencia relacionada a tu Evidence Tracker

Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.

Evidencia principal

Tema de evidencia

Cardiovascular Risk

matched_outcome

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Bleeding events

Aspirin → Bleeding events

Aspirin → Bleeding events

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Bleeding events

Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT → Bleeding events

Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT → Bleeding events

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Build your personal Evidence Workspace

Create a free account to save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

evidence suggest

La Evidencia Sugiere

  • No change in major adverse cardiovascular events with ticagrelor monotherapy.
  • Ticagrelor monotherapy showed a decrease in overall bleeding events.
  • Moderate or severe bleeding rates were similar in both treatment groups.
who this applies

A quién se aplica

  • Diabetic patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome.
  • Patients who have completed at least three months of dual antiplatelet therapy.
keep in mind

Tener en Cuenta

  • Results may not apply to non-diabetic patients or those with different coronary conditions.
  • The study did not assess long-term outcomes beyond 12 months.
  • Further research is needed to confirm findings in larger, diverse populations.
between the lines

Entre Líneas

  • The study's sample size and population may limit generalizability.
  • The follow-up period was only 12 months, which may not capture long-term outcomes.
  • Effect sizes were unclear, limiting the strength of conclusions.

Save this study

Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Aspirin and Bleeding events, Aspirin and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas

Explore in Evidence Archive

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT improve bleeding events?

Emerging Evidence

Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT appears to improve Bleeding events.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Bleeding events

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Aspirin improve bleeding events?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Aspirin for Bleeding events.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Bleeding events

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Aspirin improve composite cardiovascular events (cv death, mi, stroke, hf hospitalization)?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Aspirin for Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization).

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT improve composite cardiovascular events (cv death, mi, stroke, hf hospitalization)?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT for Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization).

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.