Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)Supplements and Vitamins
RESEARCH SUMMARY

Pilot protocol compares Ayurvedic Nimba-Amalakyadi powder versus metformin for type 2 diabetes

Low confidence
some concerns bias
Last updated May 26, 2026

Key takeaway:

This article is a pilot trial protocol in adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that plans to compare Nimba-Amalakyadi powder against metformin over 45 days, with follow-up to day 90, and no final efficacy results are reported yet.

Study at a glance

What was studied

A pilot randomized protocol comparing Nimba-Amalakyadi powder versus metformin in type 2 diabetes.

Study type

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

duration

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Intervention

Nimba-Amalakyadi powder, Metformin

Outcomes

HbA1c, Fasting Plasma Glucose, Postprandial glucose, Urine sugar

Funding

Non-industry sponsored

Main effects

No completed comparative efficacy results reported in this protocol publication

Planned glycemic endpoints include HbA1c, fasting blood sugar, postprandial glucose, and urine sugar

Feasibility endpoints include recruitment, retention, adherence, acceptability, and data completeness

Evidence Summary

InterventionOutcomeMeasured ChangeStudy Effect
Medications
Metformin
(Medications)
Glycemic Control
HbA1c
(Glycemic Control)
Uncertain
Limited
Supplements
Nimba-Amalakyadi powder
(Supplements)
Glycemic Control
Fasting Plasma Glucose
(Glycemic Control)
Uncertain
Limited
Supplements
Nimba-Amalakyadi powder
(Supplements)
Glycemic Control
HbA1c
(Glycemic Control)
Uncertain
Limited
Supplements
Nimba-Amalakyadi powder
(Supplements)
Glycemic Control
Postprandial glucose
(Glycemic Control)
Uncertain
Limited
Supplements
Nimba-Amalakyadi powder
(Supplements)
Glycemic Control
Urine sugar
(Glycemic Control)
Uncertain
Limited

Unlock Full Evidence Analysis

Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Methods section specifies randomized allocation with two groups and 45-day intervention exposure plus day-90 follow-up.
  • The paper explicitly identifies itself as a protocol and states final results are expected after completion phases.
  • Outcome variables are described as planned measurements rather than reported comparative endpoint results.
who this applies

Who this applies to

Adults aged 20-60 years with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (<6 months)

keep in mind

Keep in Mind

Interpret this as a protocol, not a completed efficacy trial.

between the lines

Between the Lines

  • This publication is a protocol and does not report final efficacy results.
  • Small planned pilot sample size (n=36) limits inferential strength.
  • Open-label design may introduce performance and expectation biases.
  • Single-center setting may limit generalizability.

Unlock Full Analysis

Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.

Already have an account?

Journal Reference

Sawarkar P, Sawarkar GR. Evaluation of the comparative efficacy of an Ayurvedic formulation (Nimba-Amalakyadi powder) vs metformin in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: protocol for a pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2026;15:e63574. doi:10.2196/63574

Connected Evidence

Discover how this study fits into the broader diabetes evidence landscape.

This study contributes to evidence on Metformin and Fasting Plasma Glucose, Metformin and HbA1c.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Archive

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention–outcome relationships.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.