Adipose tissue elastin content
Pioglitazone → Adipose tissue elastin content
Pioglitazone → Adipose tissue elastin content
- EvidenceScore™
- 58
- Emerging
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Last updated May 6, 2026
Key finding
In insulin-resistant adults with impaired glucose tolerance, pioglitazone was linked to fewer inflammatory cells in adipose tissue, better capillary density, higher elastin content, and improved insulin sensitivity.
This study re-examined fat tissue from insulin-resistant adults before and after pioglitazone treatment. Pioglitazone was linked to fewer adipose macrophages and mast cells, more capillaries, higher elastin content, and better insulin sensitivity. Because the treatment group was small and the analysis was based on secondary tissue studies, the findings are promising but not definitive.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Low
Study type
non-randomized clinical trial (non-RCT or NRCT)
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
In insulin-resistant adults with impaired glucose tolerance, pioglitazone was linked to fewer inflammatory cells in adipose tissue, better capillary density, higher elastin content, and improved insulin sensitivity.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Spencer M, Yang L, Adu A, et al. Pioglitazone Treatment Reduces Adipose Tissue Inflammation through Reduction of Mast Cell and Macrophage Number and by Improving Vascularity. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102190. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102190
Adipose tissue macrophage count ↓ after pioglitazone
Adipose tissue mast cell count ↓ after pioglitazone
Capillary density ↑ and elastin content ↑ in adipose tissue
Insulin sensitivity ↑ after treatment
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Pioglitazone and Adipose tissue elastin content, Adipose tissue macrophage count, Adipose tissue mast cell count, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Pioglitazone
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
143
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
Related evidence
Evidence relationship
Save evidence
Evidence relationship
Save evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Pioglitazone → Adipose tissue elastin content
Pioglitazone → Adipose tissue elastin content
Pioglitazone → Adipose tissue macrophage count
Pioglitazone → Adipose tissue macrophage count
Pioglitazone → Adipose tissue mast cell count
Pioglitazone → Adipose tissue mast cell count
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
These findings apply most directly to obese, insulin-resistant adults with impaired glucose tolerance who are at high risk for type 2 diabetes. The results are especially relevant to people being studied for early metabolic dysfunction rather than established treated diabetes.
The improvements were seen mainly in adipose tissue biology and insulin sensitivity, not in a large clinical outcomes trial. The treatment group was small, and this paper re-used participants from previous intervention studies. That means the study helps explain how pioglitazone may work, but it does not by itself prove broad clinical benefit for all high-risk patients.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Thiazolidinediones and Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers, Thiazolidinediones and Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers
Measures Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers as a key outcome.
All studies on Thiazolidinediones
Contributes to Thiazolidinediones evidence base.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Thiazolidinediones appears to improve Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Adipose tissue elastin content
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 58.5 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Adipose tissue macrophage count
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 58.5 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Adipose tissue mast cell count
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 58.5 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a small number of supporting studies and should be interpreted cautiously.
Limitations
Thiazolidinediones appears to improve Insulin Resistance.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Insulin sensitivity
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 58.5 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Thiazolidinediones appears to improve Endothelial Function.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Capillary density
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 58.5 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.