Adverse events incidence
Systemic glucocorticoids → Adverse events incidence
Systemic glucocorticoids → Adverse events incidence
- EvidenceScore™
- 50
- Emerging
- ImpactScore™
- 55
- Slightly Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Last updated May 6, 2026
Key finding
In one adolescent with new-onset type 1 diabetes, short courses of glucocorticoids appeared to control teplizumab-related cytokine release syndrome and allowed both teplizumab courses to be completed.
This paper describes one teenager with new-onset type 1 diabetes who developed cytokine release syndrome during two teplizumab treatment courses. Short steroid treatment appeared to control the reaction, and she completed therapy with ongoing partial remission over the next 30 months, but this was only a single-patient report.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Low
Study type
non-randomized clinical trial (non-RCT or NRCT)
Follow-up
Long-Term (> 12 mo)
Risk of bias
High Risk
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
In one adolescent with new-onset type 1 diabetes, short courses of glucocorticoids appeared to control teplizumab-related cytokine release syndrome and allowed both teplizumab courses to be completed.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Khine A, Sanda S, Torok C, Quandt Z, Gitelman SE. Glucocorticoids to Manage Cytokine Release Syndrome During Teplizumab Therapy for New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2026;49(3):e46-e48. doi:10.2337/dc25-2494
Cytokine release syndrome symptoms ↓ after short glucocorticoid treatment
Teplizumab treatment completion ↑ because both infusion courses were finished
HbA1c ↔ remained fairly low through follow-up in this one patient
Total daily insulin dose ↓ stayed relatively modest during partial remission
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Systemic glucocorticoids, Teplizumab and Adverse events incidence, Beta-cell function, HbA1c, and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Systemic glucocorticoids
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
1
Related topics
6
Evidence pairs
205
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
matched_outcome
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Systemic glucocorticoids → Adverse events incidence
Systemic glucocorticoids → Adverse events incidence
Systemic glucocorticoids → Beta-cell function
Systemic glucocorticoids → Beta-cell function
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
These findings apply most directly to adolescents or young people with new-onset type 1 diabetes receiving teplizumab who develop clinically significant cytokine release syndrome during treatment. Even then, the report reflects only one patient managed at a single center.
This paper mainly addresses adverse-event management, not a definitive test of teplizumab efficacy. The apparent benefit of glucocorticoids was limited to allowing treatment completion and symptom control in one patient. Because there was no formal comparison and many later outcomes reflect the broader effect of teplizumab itself, the case should be viewed as hypothesis-generating rather than practice-changing.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Systemic glucocorticoids and Adverse events incidence, Systemic glucocorticoids and Beta-cell Function.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Adverse events incidence
Measures Adverse events incidence as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Beta-cell Function
Measures Beta-cell Function as a key outcome.
All studies on Systemic glucocorticoids
Contributes to Systemic glucocorticoids evidence base.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Systemic glucocorticoids may improve Adverse events incidence.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Adverse events incidence
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 50.2 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Systemic glucocorticoids may improve Beta-cell function.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Beta-cell function
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 50.2 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Teplizumab may improve Beta-cell function.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Beta-cell function
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 50.2 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Teplizumab may improve HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 50.2 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.