Digital Health ToolsHealthcare Delivery & EducationType 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Thai diabetes app shows little extra HbA1c benefit over standard education

Last updated May 7, 2026

Key finding

In a 6-month randomized trial of 129 adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, a Thai-language self-management app did not lower HbA1c more than standard education alone, although fasting plasma glucose improved in participants younger than 65 years.

This study tested a Thai-language diabetes app with food logging, glucose tracking, medication reminders, exercise tracking, symptom checks, and weight monitoring. Over 6 months, the app did not improve HbA1c more than usual diabetes education, but younger users had lower fasting glucose and app users showed better self-management education scores.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

In a 6-month randomized trial of 129 adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, a Thai-language self-management app did not lower HbA1c more than standard education alone, although fasting plasma glucose improved in participants younger than 65 years.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Wongdama S, Paemueang W, Sriphrapradang C. A tailor-made mobile app with a local cuisine database for self-management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2025;10:e83685. doi:10.2196/83685

Main Effects

HbA1c ↓ in both groups, with no clear added benefit from the app

Fasting plasma glucose ↓ in participants younger than 65 years using the app

DSMES score ↑ during follow-up in the app group

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • At 6 months, mean HbA1c was 7.8% in the app group and 8.1% in the control group, but the between-group difference was not statistically significant.
  • Fasting plasma glucose was significantly lower at 6 months in the subgroup younger than 65 years assigned to the app.
  • The intervention group showed significantly higher DSMES scores from baseline to 6 months, suggesting support for self-management behaviors.
who this applies

Who this applies to

These findings apply most directly to adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in outpatient care who can use a smartphone. The results are especially relevant to Thai or similar Asian settings where local food databases may improve the usefulness of nutrition tracking.

keep in mind

Keep in Mind

The app was tested on top of diabetes self-management education and support, not instead of it. Because both groups received education, the study mainly shows whether the app adds extra benefit beyond usual structured care. The main HbA1c result was not clearly different, and the strongest glucose signal appeared in a younger subgroup.

between the lines

Between the Lines

  • This was a single-center study with 129 participants.
  • The trial was open label, so participant behavior may have been influenced by knowing group assignment.
  • Six-month analyses excluded participants with missing outcome data rather than using full intention-to-treat methods.
  • Average app adherence was moderate, which may have limited the size of any benefit.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.