Last updated September 4, 2026
Key finding
Acceptability scores averaged 3.9/5.
This study examined a digital health outreach intervention aimed at promoting postpartum diabetes screening among women with gestational diabetes, finding high acceptability and engagement.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Short-Term (≤3 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study examined a digital health outreach intervention aimed at promoting postpartum diabetes screening among women with gestational diabetes, finding high acceptability and engagement.
Promoting postpartum diabetes screening is crucial for preventing type 2 diabetes in women who had gestational diabetes. This study's findings highlight the feasibility of using digital outreach to improve screening rates, which could lead to better long-term health outcomes for mothers and their families.
The effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear. The study involved a single-arm design, limiting comparative analysis. Generalizability may be restricted due to the specific population studied.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Susan DB, Brittany LG, Jenna LR, et al. Examining the Acceptability and Feasibility of a Multi-Component Digital Health Outreach Intervention to Promote Postpartum Diabetes Screening Among Patients with Gestational Diabetes. PEC Innovation. 2024;4:100256. doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100256
Participants averaged an acceptability score of 3.9 out of 5.
At least 91% of participants read most or all of the outreach message.
89% of participants felt the information provided was 'about right'.
87% completed at least one interactive prompt.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to REACH and Completion of interactive prompts, Palatability scores, Perceived information adequacy, and 1 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
REACH
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
0
Related topics
4
Evidence pairs
0
Related studies
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
REACH → Completion of interactive prompts
REACH → Completion of interactive prompts
REACH → Perceived information adequacy
REACH → Perceived information adequacy
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on REACH and Completion of interactive prompts, REACH and Palatability scores.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Completion of interactive prompts
Measures Completion of interactive prompts as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Palatability scores
Measures Palatability scores as a key outcome.
All studies on REACH
Contributes to REACH evidence base.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
REACH appears to improve completion of interactive prompts.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Completion of interactive prompts
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
REACH appears to improve palatability scores.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Palatability scores
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
REACH appears to improve perceived information adequacy.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Perceived information adequacy
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
REACH appears to improve reading engagement.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Reading engagement
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
