Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Empagliflozin reduces body fluid volume in type 2 diabetes patients

Key finding

A significant difference in body weight change was observed (empagliflozin, −0.58 [95%CI: -1.60, 0.43] kg; glimepiride, 1.20 [95%CI: 0.15, 2.26] kg; P = 0.02)

This study compared the effects of empagliflozin and glimepiride on endothelial function in individuals with type 2 diabetes, finding no significant differences in flow-mediated dilation but notable differences in body weight and fluid volume.

Evidence strength

Moderate confidence

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Long-Term (1–5 y)

Some Concerns bias
Last updated July 5, 2026

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

Population

Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes

Intervention

Empagliflozin, Glimepiride

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Long-Term (1–5 y)

Primary outcome

flow-mediated dilation (ΔFMDs)

Comparator

Glimepiride group

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study compared the effects of empagliflozin and glimepiride on endothelial function in individuals with type 2 diabetes, finding no significant differences in flow-mediated dilation but notable differences in body weight and fluid volume.

Clinical relevance

Understanding the differential effects of diabetes medications like empagliflozin and glimepiride is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies. The significant weight loss and fluid reduction associated with empagliflozin may improve cardiovascular health and overall management of type 2 diabetes, highlighting its potential as a preferred treatment option.

Keep in mind

The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings. The trial duration may not capture long-term effects of the medications. Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled for.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Haruka T, Yoshinobu K, Kohei I, et al. Empagliflozin and Glimepiride Effects on Endothelial Function in Type 2 Diabetes. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(2):e0262831. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262831

Save this study and add notes to your research library.

Main Effects

No significant differences in flow-mediated dilation were observed (empagliflozin: −0.11%; glimepiride: −0.34%; P = 0.73).

Empagliflozin resulted in a significant weight reduction of −0.58 kg compared to a weight increase of 1.20 kg with glimepiride (P = 0.02).

Body fluid volume significantly decreased by −0.33 L after empagliflozin treatment (P = 0.03).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Empagliflozin, Glimepiride and Body weight, Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), HbA1c, and 1 more.

Primary intervention

Empagliflozin

Primary outcomes

  • Body weight
  • Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD)
  • HbA1c

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

8
Evidence pairs
8
Relationships
4
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

4

Related topics

8

Evidence pairs

300

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 8 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

StrongDecrease

body fluid volume

Empagliflozin → body fluid volume

Empagliflozin → body fluid volume

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseMetabolic Health
Unlock full evidence details
StrongDecrease

Body weight

Empagliflozin → Body weight

Empagliflozin → Body weight

Evidence profile

StrongDecreaseWeight & Anthropometrics
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD)

Empagliflozin → Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD)

Empagliflozin → Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD)

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

HbA1c

Empagliflozin → HbA1c

Empagliflozin → HbA1c

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeGlycemic Control
Unlock full evidence details
NoneDecrease

body fluid volume

Glimepiride → body fluid volume

Glimepiride → body fluid volume

Evidence profile

NoneDecreaseMetabolic Health
Unlock full evidence details
HarmfulIncrease

Body weight

Glimepiride → Body weight

Glimepiride → Body weight

Evidence profile

HarmfulIncreaseWeight & Anthropometrics
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD)

Glimepiride → Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD)

Glimepiride → Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD)

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeClinical Outcomes
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

HbA1c

Glimepiride → HbA1c

Glimepiride → HbA1c

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeGlycemic Control
Unlock full evidence details

Unlock full evidence analysis

Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Empagliflozin led to a significant weight loss of −0.58 kg compared to glimepiride.
  • Body fluid volume decreased by −0.33 L with empagliflozin treatment.
  • No significant changes in flow-mediated dilation were found between treatments.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
  • Individuals seeking medication options for diabetes management.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not be applicable to populations outside the study sample.
  • The study focused on short-term outcomes; long-term effects remain uncertain.
  • Differences in individual responses to medications may vary.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings.
  • The trial duration may not capture long-term effects of the medications.
  • Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled for.

Unlock Full Analysis

Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on SGLT2 Inhibitors and body fluid volume, SGLT2 Inhibitors and Body Weight.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Archive

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does SGLT2 Inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes?

Emerging Evidence

SGLT2 Inhibitors appears to improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD)

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 35.4 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 5 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.

Limitations

  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
5 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does SGLT2 Inhibitors improve HbA1c?

Emerging Evidence

SGLT2 Inhibitors may improve HbA1c.

ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 41.7 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
9 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does SGLT2 Inhibitors affect body weight?

Emerging Evidence

SGLT2 Inhibitors may improve Body Weight.

ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Body weight

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 48.4 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 3 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
3 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Sulfonylureas improve HbA1c?

Limited Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Sulfonylureas for HbA1c.

ConsensusScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 39.9 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
3 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.