Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Family-Centered Model Improves Glycemic Control in Adolescents with T1 Diabetes

Last updated September 9, 2026

Key finding

The average glycosylated hemoglobin levels dropped from 11.25% to 10.23% (P <.001).

This study evaluated the impact of a family-centered empowerment model on glycemic control in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes, finding significant improvements in glycosylated hemoglobin and self-efficacy.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Extended (5–20+ y)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated the impact of a family-centered empowerment model on glycemic control in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes, finding significant improvements in glycosylated hemoglobin and self-efficacy.

Clinical relevance

This research highlights the importance of family involvement in managing chronic conditions like Type 1 diabetes. By empowering families, healthcare providers can enhance adolescents' self-management skills, leading to better health outcomes and improved quality of life. These findings suggest that family-centered approaches could be a valuable addition to diabetes care strategies.

Keep in mind

Sample size may limit generalizability. The study focused only on adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. Long-term effects of the intervention were not assessed.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Amaryllis M, Laura C, Salah A, Candan O. Impact of a Family-Centered Empowerment Model on Glycemic Control in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Formative Research. 2024;8:e64463. doi:10.2196/64463

Main Effects

Glycosylated hemoglobin levels decreased from 11.25% to 10.23% (P <.001).

Self-efficacy scores increased from 81.53 to 95.09 (P <.001).

Quality of life improved significantly in 38% of participants.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Family-centered empowerment model and Communication improvement, General Self-Efficacy Scale scores, HbA1c, and 4 more.

Primary intervention

Family-centered empowerment model

Primary outcomes

  • Communication improvement
  • General Self-Efficacy Scale scores
  • HbA1c

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

7
Evidence pairs
7
Relationships
4
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

4

Related topics

7

Evidence pairs

833

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 7 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence topic

HbA1c Reduction

matched_outcome

Related evidence

Evidence topic

Mental Health

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Communication improvement

Family-centered empowerment model → Communication improvement

Family-centered empowerment model → Communication improvement

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

General Self-Efficacy Scale scores

Family-centered empowerment model → General Self-Efficacy Scale scores

Family-centered empowerment model → General Self-Efficacy Scale scores

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

Family-centered empowerment model → HbA1c

Family-centered empowerment model → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Quality of life

Family-centered empowerment model → Quality of life

Family-centered empowerment model → Quality of life

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Stress

Family-centered empowerment model → Stress

Family-centered empowerment model → Stress

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Treatment adherence

Family-centered empowerment model → Treatment adherence

Family-centered empowerment model → Treatment adherence

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Treatment obstacles decrease

Family-centered empowerment model → Treatment obstacles decrease

Family-centered empowerment model → Treatment obstacles decrease

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • Glycosylated hemoglobin decreased by 1.02% (P <.001).
  • Self-efficacy increased by 13.56 points (P <.001).
  • Quality of life improved in 38% of intervention participants.
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adolescents aged 12-18 with Type 1 diabetes.
  • Families of adolescents managing diabetes.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to younger children or adults.
  • Further research is needed to confirm long-term benefits.
  • The study's findings are based on a specific intervention model.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Sample size may limit generalizability.
  • The study focused only on adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.
  • Long-term effects of the intervention were not assessed.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Family-centered empowerment model and Communication improvement, Family-centered empowerment model and General Self-Efficacy Scale scores.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Included in these evidence collections

Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

What evidence is available on Family-centered empowerment model and communication improvement?

Emerging Evidence

Family-centered empowerment model appears to improve communication improvement.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Communication improvement

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Family-centered empowerment model improve general self-efficacy scale scores?

Emerging Evidence

Family-centered empowerment model appears to improve general self-efficacy scale scores.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    General Self-Efficacy Scale scores

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Family-centered empowerment model lower HbA1c?

Emerging Evidence

Family-centered empowerment model appears to lower HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Family-centered empowerment model improve quality of life?

Emerging Evidence

Family-centered empowerment model appears to improve quality of life.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Quality of life

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.