Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Health Storylines mAPP shows limited impact on self-management in chronic illness

Key finding

After four weeks, the intervention group showed a non-significant decrease in self-management scores (from μ=5.25 to 5.00, p=0.27).

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Health Storylines mAPP for self-management among individuals with chronic illnesses in Baguio City, Philippines, finding no significant differences in self-management scores.

Evidence strength

Moderate confidence

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Some Concerns bias
Last updated July 7, 2026

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

Population

Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes

Intervention

Health Storylines mAPP, Traditional pamphlet

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Primary outcome

Self-management score

Comparator

Comparison Group

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Health Storylines mAPP for self-management among individuals with chronic illnesses in Baguio City, Philippines, finding no significant differences in self-management scores.

Clinical relevance

Understanding the effectiveness of digital health tools like the Health Storylines mAPP is crucial for developing effective self-management strategies for chronic illnesses. This study highlights the need for further research to identify interventions that can genuinely improve self-management outcomes in this population.

Keep in mind

The study design was non-randomized, which may introduce bias. Sample size and demographic characteristics may limit generalizability. The lack of significant findings raises questions about the intervention's effectiveness.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Rainier CM, Kieren PGA, Jamee RA, et al. Effectiveness of the Health Storylines mAPP for Self-Management Among Individuals with Chronic Illnesses in Baguio City, Philippines. Acta Medica Philippina. 2026;60(7):76-83. doi:10.47895/amp.vi0.12853

Save this study and add notes to your research library.

Main Effects

The intervention group showed a non-significant decrease in self-management scores (μ=5.25 to 5.00, p=0.27).

The comparison group exhibited a non-significant increase in self-management scores (μ=5.19 to 5.37, p=0.61).

No statistically significant difference in posttest self-management scores between the two groups (U=83.50, p=0.23).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Health Storylines mAPP, Traditional pamphlet and Diabetes self-management behaviors, Post-test self-management score.

Primary intervention

Health Storylines mAPP

Primary outcomes

  • Diabetes self-management behaviors
  • Post-test self-management score

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

3
Evidence pairs
3
Relationships
1
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 63

1

Related topics

3

Evidence pairs

45

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

NoneDecrease

Diabetes self-management behaviors

Health Storylines mAPP → Diabetes self-management behaviors

Health Storylines mAPP → Diabetes self-management behaviors

Evidence profile

NoneDecreaseAdherence & Engagement
Unlock full evidence details
NoneNo Change

Post-test self-management score

Health Storylines mAPP → Post-test self-management score

Health Storylines mAPP → Post-test self-management score

Evidence profile

NoneNo ChangeAdherence & Engagement
Unlock full evidence details
NoneIncrease

Diabetes self-management behaviors

Traditional pamphlet → Diabetes self-management behaviors

Traditional pamphlet → Diabetes self-management behaviors

Evidence profile

NoneIncreaseAdherence & Engagement
Unlock full evidence details

Unlock full evidence analysis

Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • The intervention group had a decrease of 0.25 in self-management scores (p=0.27).
  • The comparison group had an increase of 0.18 in self-management scores (p=0.61).
  • No significant difference in posttest scores (U=83.50, p=0.23).
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Individuals with chronic illnesses in Baguio City, Philippines.
  • Participants engaged in self-management practices.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • The findings may not apply to other populations outside Baguio City.
  • Results were not statistically significant, indicating uncertainty in effectiveness.
  • Further research is needed to explore other digital health interventions.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study design was non-randomized, which may introduce bias.
  • Sample size and demographic characteristics may limit generalizability.
  • The lack of significant findings raises questions about the intervention's effectiveness.

Unlock Full Analysis

Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Health Storylines mAPP improve diabetes self-management behaviors?

Limited Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Health Storylines mAPP for Diabetes self-management behaviors.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Diabetes self-management behaviors

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 33.0 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Health Storylines mAPP improve post-test self-management score?

Limited Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Health Storylines mAPP for Post-test self-management score.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Post-test self-management score

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 33.0 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Traditional pamphlet improve diabetes self-management behaviors?

Limited Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Traditional pamphlet for Diabetes self-management behaviors.

ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Diabetes self-management behaviors

    EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 33.0 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.