Blood lactate concentration
Semaglutide → Blood lactate concentration
Semaglutide → Blood lactate concentration
Evidence profile
Key finding
The trial aims to assess the primary prevention of cardiovascular events.
The ASCEND PLUS trial evaluated oral semaglutide for preventing cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes but found no significant benefits.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Short-Term (≤3 mo)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Oral Semaglutide
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Short-Term (≤3 mo)
Primary outcome
Incidence of cardiovascular events
Comparator
Standard care for diabetes management
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
The ASCEND PLUS trial evaluated oral semaglutide for preventing cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes but found no significant benefits.
Understanding the effectiveness of treatments like oral semaglutide is crucial for managing type 2 diabetes and preventing cardiovascular complications. The findings suggest that while semaglutide is a valuable medication for diabetes management, it may not provide additional cardiovascular protection, highlighting the need for further research into effective prevention strategies.
The study may have limited generalizability due to specific inclusion criteria. The sample size and duration may not have been sufficient to detect subtle effects. Outcomes were primarily focused on cardiovascular events, potentially overlooking other benefits.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Muram E, Rohan W, David P, et al. ASCEND PLUS: A randomised controlled trial assessing the effects of oral semaglutide on the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Trials. 2024;25:554. doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08393-2
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
No significant difference in the incidence of cardiovascular events.
No significant difference in non-cardiovascular death rates.
No significant difference in hospitalization for cardiovascular disease.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Semaglutide and Blood lactate concentration, Cardiovascular events, Cardiovascular mortality, and 6 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Semaglutide
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
9
Evidence pairs
75
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Semaglutide → Blood lactate concentration
Semaglutide → Blood lactate concentration
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular events
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular events
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular mortality
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular mortality
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
Semaglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Hospitalization for any cardiovascular disease
Semaglutide → Hospitalization for any cardiovascular disease
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Incidence of non-cardiovascular death
Semaglutide → Incidence of non-cardiovascular death
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Incidence of vascular events within 90 days
Semaglutide → Incidence of vascular events within 90 days
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Major kidney disease events composite including end-stage renal disease, sustained eGFR decline, and death from renal or cardiovascular causes
Semaglutide → Major kidney disease events composite including end-stage renal disease, sustained eGFR decline, and death from renal or cardiovascular causes
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Relative risk reduction for major renal events
Semaglutide → Relative risk reduction for major renal events
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Cardiovascular Outcomes
Measures Cardiovascular Outcomes as a key outcome.
All studies on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Contributes to GLP-1 Receptor Agonists evidence base.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
3 results
5 results
3 results
3 results
5 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Cardiovascular events
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 60.6 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 57.7 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Semaglutide may improve Major kidney disease events composite including end-stage renal disease, sustained eGFR decline, and death from renal or cardiovascular causes.
ConsensusScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Major kidney disease events composite including end-stage renal disease, sustained eGFR decline, and death from renal or cardiovascular causes
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 47.8 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Semaglutide may improve Relative risk reduction for major renal events.
ConsensusScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Relative risk reduction for major renal events
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 47.8 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Semaglutide for Cardiovascular mortality.
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Cardiovascular mortality
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 39.7 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.