Adverse events incidence
Semaglutide → Adverse events incidence
Semaglutide → Adverse events incidence
Evidence profile
Key finding
The risk of the primary outcome in the overall trial population was 14% lower for oral semaglutide versus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77–0.96).
This study evaluated the effects of oral semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, finding a 14% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared to placebo.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Oral Semaglutide, Placebo
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Primary outcome
Time to first major adverse cardiovascular event
Comparator
Placebo
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the effects of oral semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, finding a 14% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared to placebo.
These findings are clinically significant as they suggest that oral semaglutide not only helps manage blood sugar levels in type 2 diabetes but also may lower the risk of serious cardiovascular events. This dual benefit could lead to better overall health outcomes for patients with diabetes, a population at high risk for heart disease.
The study did not assess long-term cardiovascular outcomes beyond the trial duration. Findings may not be generalizable to all populations with type 2 diabetes. Subgroup analyses did not show significant interactions for several outcomes.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Nikolaus M, John ED, Johannes FM, et al. Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Circulation. 2025;151(23):1639-1650. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074545
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Oral semaglutide reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 14%.
Significant reduction in HbA1c levels was observed with oral semaglutide compared to placebo (p=0.05).
Body mass index decreased more with oral semaglutide than with placebo (p=0.05).
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Semaglutide and Adverse events incidence, All-cause mortality, BMI, and 7 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Semaglutide
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
6
Related topics
10
Evidence pairs
435
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Semaglutide → Adverse events incidence
Semaglutide → Adverse events incidence
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → BMI
Semaglutide → BMI
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → C-reactive protein
Semaglutide → C-reactive protein
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Estimated glomerular filtration rate
Semaglutide → Estimated glomerular filtration rate
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → HbA1c
Semaglutide → HbA1c
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → LDL cholesterol
Semaglutide → LDL cholesterol
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Nonfatal stroke
Semaglutide → Nonfatal stroke
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Time to cardiovascular death
Semaglutide → Time to cardiovascular death
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Time to first nonfatal myocardial infarction event
Semaglutide → Time to first nonfatal myocardial infarction event
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and HbA1c, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Body Mass Index.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Contributes to GLP-1 Receptor Agonists evidence base.
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Body Mass Index
Measures Body Mass Index as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
11 results
4 results
11 results
11 results
4 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists appears to improve HbA1c.
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.8 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 24 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
All-cause mortality
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 54.4 | weak positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Body Mass Index.
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
BMI
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 55.2 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists appears to improve Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers.
ConsensusScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
LDL cholesterol
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 35.4 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 7 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.