All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Evidence profile
Key finding
The primary end point of first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was reduced by 20% with semaglutide versus placebo.
The study evaluated the effects of semaglutide on cardiovascular events in individuals with overweight or obesity and established cardiovascular disease without diabetes, finding a 20% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events.
Evidence strength
Moderate confidence
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
Population
Young Adult (19–39), Middle Aged (40-64), Male, Female, Asia-Pacific (APAC), with T2 Diabetes
Intervention
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Primary outcome
First major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)
Comparator
Placebo
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
The study evaluated the effects of semaglutide on cardiovascular events in individuals with overweight or obesity and established cardiovascular disease without diabetes, finding a 20% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events.
The findings are clinically significant as they suggest that semaglutide can be an effective intervention for reducing cardiovascular risks in a high-risk population. Given the increasing prevalence of obesity and related cardiovascular diseases, this treatment could help improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs associated with cardiovascular events.
The study's population may not be generalizable to all individuals with cardiovascular disease. Long-term effects of semaglutide on cardiovascular outcomes remain unclear. The trial did not include participants with diabetes, limiting applicability.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Ildiko L, John D, Steven EK, et al. Semaglutide Reduces Cardiovascular Events in Individuals with Overweight or Obesity and Established Cardiovascular Disease Without Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(8):1360-1369. doi:10.2337/dc24-0764
Save this study and add notes to your research library.
Semaglutide reduced the first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) by 20% compared to placebo.
Cardiovascular mortality risk reduction was consistent across baseline HbA1c groups.
Other cardiovascular outcomes, including nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke, showed consistent trends across HbA1c subgroups.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to Semaglutide and All-cause mortality, Cardiovascular events, Cardiovascular mortality, and 8 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Semaglutide
Primary outcomes
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
11
Evidence pairs
75
Related studies
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Semaglutide → All-cause mortality
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular events
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular events
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular mortality
Semaglutide → Cardiovascular mortality
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
Semaglutide → Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke
Semaglutide → Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Coronary revascularization
Semaglutide → Coronary revascularization
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Heart failure composite
Semaglutide → Heart failure composite
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Heart failure hospitalizations
Semaglutide → Heart failure hospitalizations
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Hospitalization for unstable angina
Semaglutide → Hospitalization for unstable angina
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Nonfatal stroke
Semaglutide → Nonfatal stroke
Evidence profile
Semaglutide → Urgent medical visit for heart failure
Semaglutide → Urgent medical visit for heart failure
Evidence profile
Create a free account to access effectiveness ratings, evidence strength and depth scores, consistency analysis, and direct links to all supporting studies.
Create a free account to unlock the bias score, detailed effectiveness analysis, and clinical outcomes for this study.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies measuring Cardiovascular Outcomes
Measures Cardiovascular Outcomes as a key outcome.
All studies on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Contributes to GLP-1 Receptor Agonists evidence base.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
3 results
5 results
3 results
3 results
5 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists may improve Cardiovascular Outcomes.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Cardiovascular events
EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 60.6 | strong positive | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Composite cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, stroke, HF hospitalization)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 57.7 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
All-cause mortality
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 54.4 | weak positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 9 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
Semaglutide may improve Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke.
ConsensusScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
Composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 47.8 | moderate positive | ConsensusScore™ Mixed | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Semaglutide for Cardiovascular mortality.
ConsensusScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Cardiovascular mortality
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 39.7 | neutral | ConsensusScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Semaglutide may worsen Nonfatal stroke or be associated with harm.
ConsensusScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
Nonfatal stroke
EvidenceScore™ Limited | EvidenceScore™ 39.2 | weak negative | ConsensusScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.