Glycemic Control

Last updated: 12 de septiembre de 2026

Key takeaway

Glycemic Control has evidence across 10 diabetes-related interventions, with strongest support for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Insulin Delivery Systems.

Evidence status
Extensive Research
Evidence Base: 82/100

Related Evidence Topics

Evidence Intelligence™

Every evidence topic is generated from structured relationships across diabetes research, including topics, interventions, outcomes, and individual studies.

1,666
Evidence relationships
2,331
Studies reviewed
26
Interventions evaluated
Strongest evidence area
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs

Top Evidence Areas

Showing grouped evidence. Expand in Evidence Explorer for detailed intervention-outcome pairs.Open Evidence Explorer

#1 Fasting Glucose

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Fasting Glucose

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
89
Strong
ImpactScore™
67
Slightly Positive
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 22 estudios
Explore evidence

#2 HbA1c

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
88
Strong
ImpactScore™
79
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
69
generally_consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 44 estudios
Explore evidence

#3 HbA1c

Insulin Delivery Systems → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
88
Strong
ImpactScore™
86
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
85
consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 21 estudios
Explore evidence

#4 CGM Time in Range

Insulin Delivery Systems → CGM Time in Range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
88
Strong
ImpactScore™
72
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
57
generally_consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 38 estudios
Explore evidence

#5 HbA1c

Insulin Therapies → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
88
Strong
ImpactScore™
72
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
63
generally_consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 19 estudios
Explore evidence

#6 HbA1c

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
87
Strong
ImpactScore™
90
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
95
consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 45 estudios
Explore evidence

#7 HbA1c

SGLT2 Inhibitors → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
86
Strong
ImpactScore™
84
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
92
consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 27 estudios
Explore evidence

#8 HbA1c

Sulfonylureas → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
86
Strong
ImpactScore™
78
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
67
generally_consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 9 estudios
Explore evidence

#9 HbA1c

Thiazolidinediones → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
86
Strong
ImpactScore™
94
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
100
consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 8 estudios
Explore evidence

#10 HbA1c

DPP-4 Inhibitors → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
86
Strong
ImpactScore™
96
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
100
consistent
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 12 estudios
Explore evidence

Practical Questions

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

Which interventions have the strongest evidence for affecting Glycemic Control?

evidence strength
Strong Evidence

Hybrid closed-loop system, Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes, and Low-carbohydrate diet have the strongest available evidence signals for Glycemic Control.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Hybrid closed-loop system

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 87.7 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 21 studies

  2. 2

    Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 87.4 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 17 studies

  3. 3

    Low-carbohydrate diet

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 86.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 24 studies

Why this answer: This answer is based on 62 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

62 supporting studies59 RCTsLatest publication: Apr 2026

Which interventions are most often studied for Glycemic Control?

most studied
Emerging Evidence

Continuous glucose monitoring, Hybrid closed-loop system, and Low-carbohydrate diet are among the most studied areas in relation to Glycemic Control.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Evidence caveat: The evidence includes both beneficial and harmful or worsening results.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Hybrid closed-loop system

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 87.7 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 25 studies

  2. 2

    Continuous glucose monitoring

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 87.6 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 26 studies

  3. 3

    Low-carbohydrate diet

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 86.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 31 studies

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

80 supporting studies79 RCTsLatest publication: Apr 2026

Where are results mixed or inconsistent for Glycemic Control?

consistency issues
Moderate Evidence

Results are mixed or unclear for whey protein 20g, Acarbose, and Basal insulin in relation to Glycemic Control.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The evidence includes both beneficial and harmful or worsening results.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Lifestyle intervention for prediabetes

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 87.1 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 9 studies

  2. 2

    Non-surgical periodontal treatment

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 84.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 14 studies

  3. 3

    Continuous glucose monitoring

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 82.7 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 9 studies

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

152 supporting studies150 RCTsLatest publication: Feb 2026

Which interventions need more research for Glycemic Control?

research gaps
Emerging Evidence

1 g omega-3 fatty acids daily and Low-carbohydrate diet need more research in relation to Glycemic Control.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    1 g omega-3 fatty acids daily

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

  2. 2

    Low-carbohydrate diet

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 56.1 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 2 studies

Why this answer: This answer is based on 3 supporting studies and existing graph evidence signals.

3 supporting studies2 RCTs

How does Semaglutide compare with Hybrid closed-loop system for Glycemic Control?

compare
Strong Evidence

Hybrid closed-loop system and Semaglutide have available evidence for Glycemic Control, but the comparison requires review of the underlying studies.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Semaglutide

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 88.2 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 16 studies

  2. 2

    Hybrid closed-loop system

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 87.7 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 21 studies

Why this answer: This answer is based on 37 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

37 supporting studies37 RCTsLatest publication: Feb 2026

Latest Research

Semaglutide reduces insulin doses in type 1 diabetes

Published: 1 de mayo de 2026
int-semaglutide
out-basal-insulin-doseout-bolus-insulin-dose

Online education improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes management

Published: 22 de abril de 2026
int-low-carbohydrate-diet
out-achievement-of-hba1c-6-5out-fasting-plasma-glucose

Nimba Amalakyadi Improves Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes

Published: 13 de marzo de 2026
int-metforminint-nimba-amalakyadi-powder
out-fasting-plasma-glucoseout-glucose-iauc-ogtt

Corticosteroids may help manage cytokine release syndrome during teplizumab therapy

Published: 1 de marzo de 2026
int-teplizumab
out-hba1c

Hybrid closed-loop system improves glycemic control in neonatal diabetes.

Published: 24 de febrero de 2026
int-hybrid-closed-loop-system
out-average-glucoseout-glucose-variability

Canagliflozin improves myocardial fibrosis in type 2 diabetes

Published: 24 de febrero de 2026
int-canagliflozin
out-hba1c

Telephone education reduces gestational diabetes risk in high-risk women

Published: 20 de febrero de 2026
int-telephone-counseling
out-blood-glucose

Artificial pancreas may improve glucose control in type 1 diabetes

Published: 20 de enero de 2026
int-hybrid-closed-loop-systemint-insulin-therapy
out-blood-glucoseout-time-above-range

Nutritional Therapy and AGIs Improve Postprandial Glucose in Diabetes

Published: 1 de enero de 2026
int-acarboseint-low-glycemic-index-treatment-lgit
out-24-hour-glucoseout-glucose-auc

Novel OGTT metrics show little predictive value for prediabetes remission

Published: 1 de enero de 2026
int-moderate-continuous-exercise
out-1-hour-glucoseout-2-hour-plasma-glucose

Evidence Landscape

Evidence landscape

Each bubble represents an evidence relationship. Position shows effectiveness and EvidenceScoreâ„¢; size reflects study volume.

  • Strong evidence
  • Moderate evidence
  • Limited evidence

Evidence Workspace

Create your evidence workspace

Save evidence topics and organize the research that matters to you.