Insulin TherapyDevices & Monitoring
Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Hybrid closed-loop artificial pancreas system improves blood sugar control better than insulin injections in hospitalized type 1 diabetes

Last updated May 15, 2026

Key finding

A 28-year-old woman with long-standing type 1 diabetes had better blood sugar control and fewer low blood sugar episodes when using a hybrid closed-loop artificial pancreas system compared to multiple insulin injections during a hospital stay.

This case report examined a woman with type 1 diabetes who switched between using an artificial pancreas system (which automatically adjusts insulin delivery) and traditional insulin injections while hospitalized. The artificial pancreas kept blood sugar in the target range 87% of the time compared to only 65% with injections, and caused fewer dangerous low blood sugar events.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Low

Study type

non-randomized clinical trial (non-RCT or NRCT)

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

High Risk

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

A 28-year-old woman with long-standing type 1 diabetes had better blood sugar control and fewer low blood sugar episodes when using a hybrid closed-loop artificial pancreas system compared to multiple insulin injections during a hospital stay.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Li S, Lv P, Lu H, et al. Initiation of Hybrid Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas System Improves Glycemic Control in a Hospitalized Type 1 Diabetes: A Case Report and Review. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2026;2026:8925266. doi:10.1155/crie/8925266

Main Effects

↑ Time in target range (3.9-10 mmol/L): increased from 65% to 87%

↓ Severe hypoglycemia: reduced from 1.8% to 0.4% of time

↓ Mean blood glucose: decreased from 8.03 to 6.93 mmol/L

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Hybrid closed-loop system and Blood glucose, Glucose variability, Hypoglycemia events, and 3 more.

Primary intervention

Hybrid closed-loop system

Primary outcomes

  • Blood glucose
  • Glucose variability
  • Hypoglycemia events

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

6
Evidence pairs
6
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 54

3

Related topics

6

Evidence pairs

373

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 6 evidence relationships
  • Uses a randomized study design signal
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence relationship

Insulin Delivery Systems and CGM Time in Range

Related evidence

Evidence relationship

Insulin Delivery Systems and Hypoglycemia

Save evidence

Evidence relationship

Insulin Delivery Systems and Glucose Variability

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Blood glucose

Hybrid closed-loop system → Blood glucose

Hybrid closed-loop system → Blood glucose

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
68
Moderate
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
100
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 3 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Glucose variability

Hybrid closed-loop system → Glucose variability

Hybrid closed-loop system → Glucose variability

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
69
Moderate
ImpactScore™
73
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
75
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 4 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Hypoglycemia events

Hybrid closed-loop system → Hypoglycemia events

Hybrid closed-loop system → Hypoglycemia events

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
75
Moderate
ImpactScore™
65
Slightly Positive
ConsistencyScore™
67
generally_consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 3 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time above range

Hybrid closed-loop system → Time above range

Hybrid closed-loop system → Time above range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
68
Moderate
ImpactScore™
86
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
100
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 4 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time below range

Hybrid closed-loop system → Time below range

Hybrid closed-loop system → Time below range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
65
Moderate
ImpactScore™
81
Positive
ConsistencyScore™
67
generally_consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 3 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Time in range

Hybrid closed-loop system → Time in range

Hybrid closed-loop system → Time in range

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
81
Strong
ImpactScore™
87
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
83
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 8 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • HCL system significantly increased time in range compared to multiple daily injections (87% vs 65%, p<0.05)
  • Automated insulin delivery reduced severe low blood sugar events (glucose <3.0 mmol/L) by 78%
  • Blood sugar fluctuations were smoother throughout the day and night, especially after meals and during sleep
who this applies

Who this applies to

This case involved a 28-year-old woman with long-standing type 1 diabetes (17 years), elevated HbA1c (11.9%), history of poor glucose control, and frequent hypoglycemia. The findings may be most relevant for adults with type 1 diabetes who have difficulty achieving stable glucose control with insulin injections, particularly those experiencing frequent low blood sugar episodes.

keep in mind

Keep in Mind

This is a single case report, not a controlled study with multiple participants, so the results should be interpreted cautiously. The patient was hospitalized and closely monitored, which may not reflect typical outpatient care. The Android-based hybrid closed-loop system used is a do-it-yourself (DIY) system that is not commercially approved or regulated in China, and requires significant technical knowledge to set up and maintain. The cost of insulin pumps and CGM devices is not covered by medical insurance in China, limiting accessibility for most patients.

between the lines

Between the Lines

  • Case report of only one patient - results may not apply to all people with type 1 diabetes
  • Short observation period of just 7 days for each treatment method
  • Patient was hospitalized, so results may differ in outpatient or real-world settings
  • AndroidAPS system is not commercially approved in China and requires technical expertise to set up

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Insulin Delivery Systems and CGM Time in Range, Insulin Delivery Systems and Hypoglycemia.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Insulin Delivery Systems improve cgm time in range?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems may improve CGM Time in Range.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Time in range

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 81.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

  2. 2

    Time above range

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 68.4 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

  3. 3

    Time below range

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 64.6 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 17 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
17 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Insulin Delivery Systems affect hypoglycemia?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems may improve Hypoglycemia.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Hypoglycemia events

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 74.6 | weak positive | ConsistencyScore™ Generally Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
6 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Insulin Delivery Systems improve glucose variability?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems may improve Glucose Variability.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Glucose variability

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.4 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 7 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
7 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Insulin Delivery Systems improve fasting glucose?

Strong Evidence

Insulin Delivery Systems appears to improve Fasting Glucose.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Blood glucose

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 67.6 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 5 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
5 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.