Resumen de Investigación
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

AI-enabled mHealth shows similar effectiveness to traditional methods for diabetes prevention

Última actualización 8 de julio de 2026

Key finding

No significant between-group differences were observed for primary outcomes (aOR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.3, P =.74).

This study evaluated the effectiveness of an AI-enabled mHealth intervention for diabetes prevention in rural India, finding no significant differences in key outcomes between intervention and control groups.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Guarda este estudio en tu Evidence Tracker para encontrarlo facilmente cuando lo necesites.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated the effectiveness of an AI-enabled mHealth intervention for diabetes prevention in rural India, finding no significant differences in key outcomes between intervention and control groups.

Clinical relevance

Understanding the effectiveness of mHealth interventions is crucial for developing strategies to prevent diabetes, especially in rural areas where access to healthcare is limited. The findings suggest that simply using AI for personalized messaging may not be sufficient to drive meaningful health behavior changes.

Keep in mind

The study design was quasi-experimental, limiting causal inferences. Sample size and demographic diversity may affect generalizability. Outcomes measured may not capture all relevant health behaviors.

Published in

Referencia de la Revista

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Amaryllis M, Stefano B, Aditya PT, et al. Effectiveness of an AI-Enabled mHealth Intervention for Diabetes Prevention in Rural India: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2025;27:e79283. doi:10.2196/79283

Efectos Principales

Physical activity goal achievement showed no significant differences (aOR 1.0, P =.74).

Daily fruit intake was modestly higher in the intervention group (aOR 1.4, P =.24).

Mean BMI difference at endline was -0.0 kg/m² (P =.95).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion and Body Mass Index (BMI) change, Engagement in Farm Work, Fruit and vegetable intake, and 4 more.

Primary intervention

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion

Primary outcomes

  • Body Mass Index (BMI) change
  • Engagement in Farm Work
  • Fruit and vegetable intake

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

7
Evidence pairs
7
Relationships
5
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 72

5

Related topics

7

Evidence pairs

303

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 7 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Agrega evidencia relacionada a tu Evidence Tracker

Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.

Evidencia principal

Relación de evidencia

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index

Evidencia relacionada

Relación de evidencia

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Physical Activity Levels

Seguir evidencia

Tema de evidencia

Treatment Adherence

Seguir evidencia

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Body Mass Index (BMI) change

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Body Mass Index (BMI) change

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Body Mass Index (BMI) change

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Engagement in Farm Work

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Engagement in Farm Work

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Engagement in Farm Work

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Fruit and vegetable intake

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Fruit and vegetable intake

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Fruit and vegetable intake

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Odds of helping with household chores

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Odds of helping with household chores

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Odds of helping with household chores

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Odds of stair use

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Odds of stair use

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Odds of stair use

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Odds of walking for chores

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Odds of walking for chores

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Odds of walking for chores

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion → Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
73
Positive
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Score 69 · Based on 2 studies
ConsistencyScore™
35
mixed
Supporting studies: Based on 2 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

Build your personal Evidence Workspace

Create a free account to save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

evidence suggest

La Evidencia Sugiere

  • No significant differences in physical activity goal achievement (P =.74).
  • Modest increase in daily fruit intake in the intervention group (P =.24).
  • BMI change was negligible with no significant difference (P =.95).
who this applies

A quién se aplica

  • Adults in rural India at risk for diabetes.
  • Individuals seeking lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention.
keep in mind

Tener en Cuenta

  • Results may not apply to urban populations or different cultural contexts.
  • The effectiveness of AI-enabled interventions may require further exploration.
  • Behavioral change in health may depend on factors beyond messaging.
between the lines

Entre Líneas

  • The study design was quasi-experimental, limiting causal inferences.
  • Sample size and demographic diversity may affect generalizability.
  • Outcomes measured may not capture all relevant health behaviors.

Save this study

Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Physical Activity Levels, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index.

Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas

Explore in Evidence Archive

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Explora más en el archivo de evidencia

Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs affect body mass index?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Body Mass Index.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Body Mass Index (BMI) change

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
11 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve physical activity levels?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Physical Activity Levels.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Physical activity level (MET-minutes per week)

    EvidenceScore™ Moderate | EvidenceScore™ 69.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Mixed | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
5 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion improve engagement in farm work?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion for Engagement in Farm Work.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Engagement in Farm Work

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026

Does SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion improve fruit and vegetable intake?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of SMS text messaging behavioral intervention for health promotion for Fruit and vegetable intake.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Fruit and vegetable intake

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
  • Consistency cannot yet be determined.
  • Population details are unavailable.
1 supporting studyUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.