Resumen de Investigación
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Scalable diabetes education improves care coordination

Última actualización 8 de julio de 2026

Key finding

Mean difference at 12-month; -0.1% (-0.4 to 0.1) for nurse-led.

This study evaluated the effectiveness of scalable diabetes self-management education and support models in adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Results showed no significant changes in key health outcomes.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Long-Term (1–5 y)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Guarda este estudio en tu Evidence Tracker para encontrarlo facilmente cuando lo necesites.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated the effectiveness of scalable diabetes self-management education and support models in adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Results showed no significant changes in key health outcomes.

Clinical relevance

Understanding the effectiveness of diabetes self-management education is crucial for developing effective interventions. This study highlights the challenges in achieving significant health improvements through scalable education models, which can inform future program designs and resource allocation.

Keep in mind

The study did not demonstrate significant effectiveness of the interventions. Sample size and participant characteristics may limit generalizability. Outcomes measured may not capture all aspects of diabetes management.

Published in

Referencia de la Revista

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Piyachon A, Iliatha PN, Poppy ACM, et al. Effectiveness of Scalable Models of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia. 2026;49:100778. doi:10.1016/j.lansea.2026.100778

Efectos Principales

Nurse-led intervention showed a mean HbA1c difference of -0.1% (p=0.45), indicating no significant change.

Peer-assisted intervention showed a mean HbA1c difference of 0.1% (p=0.85), indicating no significant change.

No significant differences were found in BMI, waist circumference, or other metabolic markers.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to DSMES and BMI, Diastolic blood pressure, Difference in Thai-CV risk score at 12 months compared to routine care, and 8 more.

Primary intervention

DSMES

Primary outcomes

  • BMI
  • Diastolic blood pressure
  • Difference in Thai-CV risk score at 12 months compared to routine care

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

11
Evidence pairs
11
Relationships
4
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 72

4

Related topics

11

Evidence pairs

475

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 11 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Agrega evidencia relacionada a tu Evidence Tracker

Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.

Evidencia principal

Relación de evidencia

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Fasting Glucose

Evidencia relacionada

Relación de evidencia

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c

Seguir evidencia

Relación de evidencia

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index

Seguir evidencia

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

BMI

DSMES → BMI

DSMES → BMI

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Diastolic blood pressure

DSMES → Diastolic blood pressure

DSMES → Diastolic blood pressure

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Fasting blood sugar (FBS)

DSMES → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)

DSMES → Fasting blood sugar (FBS)

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

DSMES → HbA1c

DSMES → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
75
Positive
EvidenceScore™
Strong
Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
ConsistencyScore™
75
consistent
Supporting studies: Based on 4 studies
Add to Evidence Tracker

HDL cholesterol

DSMES → HDL cholesterol

DSMES → HDL cholesterol

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

LDL cholesterol

DSMES → LDL cholesterol

DSMES → LDL cholesterol

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Systolic blood pressure

DSMES → Systolic blood pressure

DSMES → Systolic blood pressure

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Total cholesterol

DSMES → Total cholesterol

DSMES → Total cholesterol

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Triglycerides

DSMES → Triglycerides

DSMES → Triglycerides

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Waist circumference

DSMES → Waist circumference

DSMES → Waist circumference

Evidence Intelligence™
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Build your personal Evidence Workspace

Create a free account to save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

evidence suggest

La Evidencia Sugiere

  • Nurse-led intervention resulted in a -0.1% change in HbA1c, not statistically significant.
  • Peer-assisted intervention showed a 0.1% change in HbA1c, also not statistically significant.
  • No significant differences in metabolic markers like BMI and cholesterol levels.
who this applies

A quién se aplica

  • Adults diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes.
  • Participants seeking scalable diabetes education and support.
keep in mind

Tener en Cuenta

  • Results may not apply to populations outside the study sample.
  • Interventions did not show clinically meaningful changes in health outcomes.
  • Future studies may need to explore different approaches or larger sample sizes.
between the lines

Entre Líneas

  • The study did not demonstrate significant effectiveness of the interventions.
  • Sample size and participant characteristics may limit generalizability.
  • Outcomes measured may not capture all aspects of diabetes management.

Save this study

Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.

Today's Activity

Your Evidence Workspace

Free account

Saved this study

Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.

Evidence Tracker

12 tracked topics

Saved Studies

48 studies

Research Notes

Coming Soon

Weekly Evidence Digest

Coming Soon

Already have an account?

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index.

Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas

Explore in Evidence Archive

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve fasting glucose?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Fasting Glucose.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Fasting blood sugar (FBS)

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 8 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
8 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve HbA1c?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 28 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
28 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs affect body mass index?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Body Mass Index.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.

Evidence caveat: The available evidence reports mixed findings.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    BMI

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
11 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026

Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve body composition?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Body Composition.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Waist circumference

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 6 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.

Limitations

  • Population details are unavailable.
6 supporting studiesUpdated: Jul 2026
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.