- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Scalable diabetes education improves care coordination
Última actualización 8 de julio de 2026
Key finding
Mean difference at 12-month; -0.1% (-0.4 to 0.1) for nurse-led.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of scalable diabetes self-management education and support models in adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Results showed no significant changes in key health outcomes.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Guarda este estudio en tu Evidence Tracker para encontrarlo facilmente cuando lo necesites.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study's main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study evaluated the effectiveness of scalable diabetes self-management education and support models in adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Results showed no significant changes in key health outcomes.
Clinical relevance
Understanding the effectiveness of diabetes self-management education is crucial for developing effective interventions. This study highlights the challenges in achieving significant health improvements through scalable education models, which can inform future program designs and resource allocation.
Keep in mind
The study did not demonstrate significant effectiveness of the interventions. Sample size and participant characteristics may limit generalizability. Outcomes measured may not capture all aspects of diabetes management.
Published in
Referencia de la Revista
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Piyachon A, Iliatha PN, Poppy ACM, et al. Effectiveness of Scalable Models of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia. 2026;49:100778. doi:10.1016/j.lansea.2026.100778
Efectos Principales
Nurse-led intervention showed a mean HbA1c difference of -0.1% (p=0.45), indicating no significant change.
Peer-assisted intervention showed a mean HbA1c difference of 0.1% (p=0.85), indicating no significant change.
No significant differences were found in BMI, waist circumference, or other metabolic markers.
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to DSMES and BMI, Diastolic blood pressure, Difference in Thai-CV risk score at 12 months compared to routine care, and 8 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
DSMES
Primary outcomes
- BMI
- Diastolic blood pressure
- Difference in Thai-CV risk score at 12 months compared to routine care
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
4
Related topics
11
Evidence pairs
475
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 11 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 4 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Agrega evidencia relacionada a tu Evidence Tracker
Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.
Evidencia principal
Relación de evidencia
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Fasting Glucose
Evidencia relacionada
Relación de evidencia
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c
Seguir evidencia
Relación de evidencia
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index
Seguir evidencia
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Difference in Thai-CV risk score at 12 months compared to routine care
DSMES → Difference in Thai-CV risk score at 12 months compared to routine care
DSMES → Difference in Thai-CV risk score at 12 months compared to routine care
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- ImpactScore™
- 75
- Positive
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
- ConsistencyScore™
- 75
- consistent
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Build your personal Evidence Workspace
Create a free account to save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Today's Activity
Your Evidence Workspace
Saved this study
Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.
Evidence Tracker
12 tracked topics
Saved Studies
48 studies
Research Notes
Coming Soon
Weekly Evidence Digest
Coming Soon
La Evidencia Sugiere
- Nurse-led intervention resulted in a -0.1% change in HbA1c, not statistically significant.
- Peer-assisted intervention showed a 0.1% change in HbA1c, also not statistically significant.
- No significant differences in metabolic markers like BMI and cholesterol levels.
A quién se aplica
- Adults diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes.
- Participants seeking scalable diabetes education and support.
Tener en Cuenta
- Results may not apply to populations outside the study sample.
- Interventions did not show clinically meaningful changes in health outcomes.
- Future studies may need to explore different approaches or larger sample sizes.
Entre Líneas
- The study did not demonstrate significant effectiveness of the interventions.
- Sample size and participant characteristics may limit generalizability.
- Outcomes measured may not capture all aspects of diabetes management.
Save this study
Keep this study in your Evidence Tracker so you can easily find it again whenever you need it.
Today's Activity
Your Evidence Workspace
Saved this study
Your free account becomes your personal diabetes evidence workspace.
Evidence Tracker
12 tracked topics
Saved Studies
48 studies
Research Notes
Coming Soon
Weekly Evidence Digest
Coming Soon
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and HbA1c, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Body Mass Index.
Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas
Explore in Evidence ArchiveThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → HbA1c
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- ImpactScore™
- 75
- Positive
- EvidenceScore™
- Strong
- Score 79 · Based on 4 studies
- ConsistencyScore™
- 75
- consistent
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Body Mass Index
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs → Blood Pressure
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Incluido en estas colecciones de evidencia
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs Evidence Hub
All studies on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs
Contributes to Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs evidence base.
HbA1c Evidence Hub
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
Blood Pressure Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Blood Pressure
Measures Blood Pressure as a key outcome.
Body Mass Index Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Body Mass Index
Measures Body Mass Index as a key outcome.
Recent Diabetes Research
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Explora más en el archivo de evidencia
Jump to pre-filtered views in the evidence archive.
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve fasting glucose?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Fasting Glucose.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Fasting blood sugar (FBS)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 8 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve HbA1c?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 79.0 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 28 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs affect body mass index?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve Body Mass Index.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are mixed and should be interpreted cautiously.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
BMI
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is cautious because the available studies report mixed findings.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Does Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve body composition?
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs appears to improve Body Composition.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Waist circumference
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 6 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Limitations
- Population details are unavailable.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, archive views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in archive
Open broader archive views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.