Resumen de Investigación
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Sick-day education improves knowledge in type 2 diabetes patients

Última actualización 16 de agosto de 2026

Key finding

Knowledge scores improved in the intervention group (p<0.01).

This study evaluated the effectiveness of sick-day education provided by community pharmacists to patients with Type 2 diabetes. Knowledge scores improved significantly in the intervention group.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Short-Term (≤3 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Guarda investigacion, organiza estudios y vuelve a encontrar evidencia importante rapidamente.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study evaluated the effectiveness of sick-day education provided by community pharmacists to patients with Type 2 diabetes. Knowledge scores improved significantly in the intervention group.

Clinical relevance

Improving knowledge about managing diabetes during illness is crucial for patient self-care. While the education intervention showed promise in enhancing knowledge, the lack of impact on anxiety and attitudes suggests that further strategies may be needed to address these areas in diabetes management.

Keep in mind

Limited to a specific population of Type 2 diabetes patients. Potential lack of generalizability to other diabetes types or settings. Small sample size may affect the robustness of findings.

Published in

Referencia de la Revista

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Keisuke K, Hiroshi O, Shota S, et al. Effectiveness of Sick-Day Education by Community Pharmacists Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice. 2023;16:104. doi:10.1186/s40545-023-00614-4

Efectos Principales

Knowledge scores improved in the intervention group (p<0.01).

No significant differences in anxiety scores between groups (p=0.79).

No significant differences in intention scores between groups (p=0.39).

No significant differences in attitude scores between groups (p=0.13).

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Remote multiprofessional educational program and Anxiety score, Attitude score measured before and after intervention, Intention score measured before and after intervention, and 1 more.

Primary intervention

Remote multiprofessional educational program

Primary outcomes

  • Anxiety score
  • Attitude score measured before and after intervention
  • Intention score measured before and after intervention

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

4
Evidence pairs
4
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

3

Related topics

4

Evidence pairs

295

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 4 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Agrega evidencia relacionada a tu Evidence Tracker

Guarda estudios y paginas de evidencia, organiza tu Evidence Tracker y manten en un solo lugar la investigacion que te importa.

Evidencia principal

Relación de evidencia

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Mental Health

Evidencia relacionada

Tema de evidencia

Diabetes Self-Management Education

Guardar evidencia

Tema de evidencia

Mental Health

Guardar evidencia

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Anxiety score

Remote multiprofessional educational program → Anxiety score

Remote multiprofessional educational program → Anxiety score

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Attitude score measured before and after intervention

Remote multiprofessional educational program → Attitude score measured before and after intervention

Remote multiprofessional educational program → Attitude score measured before and after intervention

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Intention score measured before and after intervention

Remote multiprofessional educational program → Intention score measured before and after intervention

Remote multiprofessional educational program → Intention score measured before and after intervention

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Type 1 diabetes knowledge score

Remote multiprofessional educational program → Type 1 diabetes knowledge score

Remote multiprofessional educational program → Type 1 diabetes knowledge score

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Estudios de apoyo: Basado en 1 estudio
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

La Evidencia Sugiere

  • Knowledge scores increased significantly by 1 point (p<0.01).
  • Anxiety, intention, and attitude scores showed no significant changes.
  • Overall effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear.
who this applies

A quién se aplica

  • Adults diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients receiving care from community pharmacists.
keep in mind

Tener en Cuenta

  • The study's findings may not apply to younger populations or those with Type 1 diabetes.
  • The intervention's impact on emotional and behavioral aspects was limited.
  • Further research is needed to explore additional strategies for improving anxiety and attitudes.
between the lines

Entre Líneas

  • Limited to a specific population of Type 2 diabetes patients.
  • Potential lack of generalizability to other diabetes types or settings.
  • Small sample size may affect the robustness of findings.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Mental Health, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs and Attitude score measured before and after intervention.

Relaciones de evidencia relacionadas

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Explora más en Evidence Explorer

Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Do Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs improve mental health?

Strong Evidence

Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) Programs may improve mental health.

ConsistencyScore™: Results are generally consistent across studies.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Anxiety score

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on 12 supporting studies with generally consistent results and a positive effect signal.

12 supporting studies

Does Remote multiprofessional educational program improve type 1 diabetes knowledge score?

Emerging Evidence

Remote multiprofessional educational program appears to improve type 1 diabetes knowledge score.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Type 1 diabetes knowledge score

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Remote multiprofessional educational program improve attitude score measured before and after intervention?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Remote multiprofessional educational program for attitude score measured before and after intervention.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Attitude score measured before and after intervention

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Remote multiprofessional educational program improve intention score measured before and after intervention?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Remote multiprofessional educational program for intention score measured before and after intervention.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Intention score measured before and after intervention

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

Sin anuncios. Sin rastreo.

Centrada en la evidencia, no en la publicidad.

Segura y privada

Tus datos siempre están protegidos.

Siempre al día

Se agregan nuevos estudios todos los días.