Research Summary
Analyzed using Evidence Intelligence™

Both insulin adjustment methods effectively lower A1C in type 2 diabetes.

Last updated September 2, 2026

Key finding

The change from baseline was -40.4 mg/dl in the simple algorithm group (P < 0.0001).

This study compared the effectiveness of carbohydrate counting and a simple algorithm for insulin adjustment in managing Type 2 diabetes. Both methods showed improvements in A1C levels, but the differences were not statistically significant.

Quick read

Study at a glance

The essential study design details in one scan.

EvidenceScore™

Moderate

Study type

RCTs

Follow-up

Medium-Term (3–12 mo)

Risk of bias

Some Concerns

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Plain-language summary

What this paper says

A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.

Study focus

This study compared the effectiveness of carbohydrate counting and a simple algorithm for insulin adjustment in managing Type 2 diabetes. Both methods showed improvements in A1C levels, but the differences were not statistically significant.

Clinical relevance

Understanding effective methods for managing Type 2 diabetes is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study provides insights into two practical approaches that can help patients achieve better blood sugar control, which is essential for reducing the risk of diabetes-related complications.

Keep in mind

The study had a small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. No significant differences were found between the two interventions, indicating unclear effectiveness. The study did not measure long-term outcomes beyond 24 weeks.

Published in

Journal Reference

Publication details and source links for this paper.

Richard MB, Mary J, Margaret AP, et al. Comparison of Insulin-to-Carbohydrate Ratio and Simple Algorithm for Insulin Adjustment in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(7):1305-1310. doi:10.2337/dc07-2137

Main Effects

A1C levels at week 24 were 6.54% for carbohydrate counting and 6.70% for the simple algorithm.

69.2% of the carbohydrate counting group achieved A1C <7.0%, while 73.2% of the algorithm group did.

The mean A1C change from baseline to week 24 was -1.59% for carbohydrate counting and -1.46% for the simple algorithm.

Evidence network

How this study fits

Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.

Evidence Context

This study contributes evidence to Carbohydrate Counting, Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment and Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24, Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), HbA1c, and 3 more.

Primary intervention

Carbohydrate Counting

Primary outcomes

  • Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24
  • Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
  • HbA1c

Evidence relationships

Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.

11
Evidence pairs
11
Relationships
3
Evidence topics
contributes_evidence

Editorial context

Why this study matters

See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.

Evidence network role

This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.

Moderate contributionModerate confidenceNetwork score: 68

3

Related topics

11

Evidence pairs

1278

Related studies

High relevance in at least one topic

Why it is useful

  • Contributes to 11 evidence relationships
  • Includes primary outcome data
  • Linked to 3 direct semantic evidence topics

Topic contributions

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Evidence topic

Contributes evidence

Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker

Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.

Primary evidence

Evidence topic

Fasting Blood Glucose

matched_outcome

Related evidence

Evidence topic

Glycemic Control

Save evidence

Core evidence

Study findings

The primary outcomes reported in this study.

Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Carbohydrate Counting → Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Carbohydrate Counting → Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Carbohydrate Counting → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Carbohydrate Counting → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

Carbohydrate Counting → HbA1c

Carbohydrate Counting → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Proportion achieving HbA1c under 6.5%

Carbohydrate Counting → Proportion achieving HbA1c under 6.5%

Carbohydrate Counting → Proportion achieving HbA1c under 6.5%

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Proportion achieving HbA1c under 7.0%

Carbohydrate Counting → Proportion achieving HbA1c under 7.0%

Carbohydrate Counting → Proportion achieving HbA1c under 7.0%

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Severe hypoglycemia

Carbohydrate Counting → Severe hypoglycemia

Carbohydrate Counting → Severe hypoglycemia

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

HbA1c

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → HbA1c

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → HbA1c

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
100
Very Positive
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Proportion achieving HbA1c under 6.5%

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → Proportion achieving HbA1c under 6.5%

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → Proportion achieving HbA1c under 6.5%

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Severe hypoglycemia

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → Severe hypoglycemia

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment → Severe hypoglycemia

Evidence Intelligence™
EvidenceScore™
Emerging
Score 59 · Based on 1 study
ImpactScore™
50
Neutral
ConsistencyScore™
unclear
Not enough independent studies
Supporting studies: Based on 1 study
Add to Evidence Tracker

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

evidence suggest

Evidence Suggest

  • A1C levels decreased by -1.59% for carbohydrate counting (p = 0.24).
  • 69.2% of the carb counting group achieved A1C <7.0%.
  • Fasting plasma glucose decreased by -50.6 mg/dl in the carb count group (p = 0.059).
who this applies

Who this applies to

  • Adults diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients seeking dietary management strategies for diabetes control.
keep in mind

Keep in Mind

  • Results may not apply to populations outside the study sample.
  • Further research is needed to explore long-term effects of both interventions.
  • The lack of significant differences suggests that either method may be viable for patients.
between the lines

Between the Lines

  • The study had a small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
  • No significant differences were found between the two interventions, indicating unclear effectiveness.
  • The study did not measure long-term outcomes beyond 24 weeks.

Evidence Library

Build your evidence library

Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.

Connected Evidence

Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.

Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.

This study contributes to evidence on Carbohydrate Counting and Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24, Carbohydrate Counting and Fasting Glucose.

Related evidence relationships

Explore in Evidence Explorer

This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.

Questions answered by this study

Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.

Does Carbohydrate Counting lower HbA1c?

Emerging Evidence

Carbohydrate Counting appears to lower HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment improve fasting plasma glucose (FPG)?

Emerging Evidence

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment appears to improve fasting plasma glucose (FPG).

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment lower HbA1c?

Emerging Evidence

Simple algorithm for insulin adjustment appears to lower HbA1c.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    HbA1c

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study

Does Carbohydrate Counting improve change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24?

Emerging Evidence

Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Carbohydrate Counting for change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24.

ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.

Ranked evidence signals

  1. 1

    Change in aortic pulse wave velocity from baseline to week 24

    EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study

Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.

Limitations

  • Only one supporting study is available.
1 supporting study
Learn how Evidence Intelligence™ works

Next steps

Continue your research

Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.

No ads. No tracking.

Focused on evidence, not advertising.

Secure & private

Your data is always protected.

Always up to date

New studies added every day.