- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Carbohydrate counting improves metabolic control in youth with type 1 diabetes
Last updated September 2, 2026
Key finding
Mean values of HbA1c at the end of the second year were significantly lower in the carb counting group (p=0.010).
This study investigated the effects of carbohydrate counting on metabolic control in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, finding significant reductions in HbA1c levels.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Medium-Term (3–12 mo)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study investigated the effects of carbohydrate counting on metabolic control in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, finding significant reductions in HbA1c levels.
Clinical relevance
Improving metabolic control in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus is crucial for reducing long-term complications associated with the disease. The findings suggest that carbohydrate counting can be an effective dietary strategy to enhance glycemic control and potentially improve overall health outcomes in this population.
Keep in mind
The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings. The duration of the study may not capture long-term effects of carbohydrate counting. Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Damla G, Yasemin AA, Samim &, Günay D, Şükran D. Effects of Carbohydrate Counting on Metabolic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology. 2014;6(2):74-78. doi:10.4274/jcrpe.1191
Main Effects
Carbohydrate counting led to a significant reduction in HbA1c levels by 0.89% (p=0.010).
High-density lipoprotein levels increased significantly in the carbohydrate counting group (0.15 mmol/L, p=0.02).
No significant differences were found in BMI SDS, total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides, or daily insulin doses.
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Carbohydrate Counting and BMI, High-density lipoprotein, Low-density lipoprotein, and 4 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Carbohydrate Counting
Primary outcomes
- BMI
- High-density lipoprotein
- Low-density lipoprotein
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Primary outcomes
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
7
Evidence pairs
841
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 7 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 2 direct semantic evidence topics
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence topic
HbA1c Reduction
matched_outcome
Related evidence
Evidence topic
Weight Loss
Save evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
High-density lipoprotein
Carbohydrate Counting → High-density lipoprotein
Carbohydrate Counting → High-density lipoprotein
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Low-density lipoprotein
Carbohydrate Counting → Low-density lipoprotein
Carbohydrate Counting → Low-density lipoprotein
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Reduction in Hemoglobin A1C levels
Carbohydrate Counting → Reduction in Hemoglobin A1C levels
Carbohydrate Counting → Reduction in Hemoglobin A1C levels
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Total daily insulin dose
Carbohydrate Counting → Total daily insulin dose
Carbohydrate Counting → Total daily insulin dose
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- HbA1c levels decreased significantly in the carbohydrate counting group (p=0.010).
- High-density lipoprotein levels increased significantly in the carbohydrate counting group (p=0.02).
- No significant changes in BMI, cholesterol, or insulin doses were observed.
Who this applies to
- Children and adolescents diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
- Patients seeking dietary interventions to improve metabolic control.
Keep in Mind
- Results may not be applicable to adults or those with Type 2 Diabetes.
- The study did not explore the psychological impact of carbohydrate counting.
- Further research is needed to assess long-term adherence and outcomes.
Between the Lines
- The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings.
- The duration of the study may not capture long-term effects of carbohydrate counting.
- Potential confounding factors were not fully controlled.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Carbohydrate Counting and Body Mass Index, Carbohydrate Counting and Insulin Resistance.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Carbohydrate Counting → Body Mass Index
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Carbohydrate Counting → Insulin Resistance
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Carbohydrate Counting → Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers
Behavioral & Lifestyle
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers
Measures Adipokine and Angiogenic Markers as a key outcome.
Body Mass Index Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Body Mass Index
Measures Body Mass Index as a key outcome.
Carbohydrate Counting Evidence Hub
All studies on Carbohydrate Counting
Contributes to Carbohydrate Counting evidence base.
Insulin Resistance Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Insulin Resistance
Measures Insulin Resistance as a key outcome.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on Carbohydrate Counting and BMI
1 results
All studies on Carbohydrate Counting and Total daily insulin dose
1 results
All studies on Carbohydrate Counting
1 results
All studies measuring BMI
1 results
All studies measuring Total daily insulin dose
1 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Carbohydrate Counting improve high-density lipoprotein?
Carbohydrate Counting appears to improve high-density lipoprotein.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
High-density lipoprotein
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
What evidence is available on Carbohydrate Counting and reduction in hemoglobin a1c levels?
Carbohydrate Counting appears to reduce reduction in hemoglobin a1c levels.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Reduction in Hemoglobin A1C levels
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Carbohydrate Counting affect BMI?
Current evidence does not show a clear effect of Carbohydrate Counting on BMI.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
BMI
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Carbohydrate Counting improve low-density lipoprotein?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Carbohydrate Counting for low-density lipoprotein.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Low-density lipoprotein
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
