- EvidenceScore™
- 85
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 81
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 85
- consistent
CGM at discharge may reduce hospital re-presentations in T2D patients
Last updated August 29, 2026
Key finding
Only 2 (10%) of the 19 participants had an unplanned hospital re-presentation in the first month after discharge.
This pilot study evaluated the impact of continuous glucose monitoring initiated at hospital discharge in individuals with type 2 diabetes, finding low hospital re-presentation rates and high participant satisfaction.
Quick read
Study at a glance
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Extended (5–20+ y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
What this paper says
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This pilot study evaluated the impact of continuous glucose monitoring initiated at hospital discharge in individuals with type 2 diabetes, finding low hospital re-presentation rates and high participant satisfaction.
Clinical relevance
This study highlights the potential benefits of continuous glucose monitoring for managing diabetes after hospital discharge, suggesting it may reduce the likelihood of readmissions and improve patient outcomes. These findings could encourage healthcare providers to implement such monitoring strategies to enhance diabetes management.
Keep in mind
Small sample size limits generalizability. Short follow-up period may not capture long-term effects. Lack of control group for comparison.
Published in
Journal Reference
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Kara M, Rebekah G, Aristides V, Barbara D, Ann P. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Initiated on Hospital Discharge in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study. JMIR Diabetes. 2022;7(2):e35163. doi:10.2196/35163
Main Effects
Only 10% of participants had unplanned hospital re-presentations within one month post-discharge.
HbA1c levels improved or remained stable in 94% of participants at three months.
84% of participants reported being satisfied with the continuous glucose monitoring device.
Evidence network
How this study fits
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
Evidence Context
This study contributes evidence to Continuous glucose monitoring and HbA1c, Participant satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
Continuous glucose monitoring
Primary outcomes
- HbA1c
- Participant satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
- Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge
Evidence topics
Primary intervention
Evidence relationships
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
Why this study matters
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
2
Related topics
3
Evidence pairs
859
Related studies
Why it is useful
- Contributes to 3 evidence relationships
- Includes primary outcome data
- Linked to 1 direct semantic evidence topic
Topic contributions
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Evidence topic
Contributes evidence
Add related evidence to your Evidence Tracker
Save studies and evidence pages, organize your personal Evidence Tracker, and keep the research you care about in one place.
Primary evidence
Evidence relationship
Insulin Delivery Systems and HbA1c
Related evidence
Evidence topic
HbA1c Reduction
Save evidence
Evidence topic
Diabetes Technology
Save evidence
Core evidence
Study findings
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
Participant satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Continuous glucose monitoring → Participant satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Continuous glucose monitoring → Participant satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 100
- Very Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge
Continuous glucose monitoring → Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge
Continuous glucose monitoring → Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Suggest
- 10% hospital re-presentation rate compared to a published rate of 17%.
- HbA1c improved or stable in 17 of 18 participants.
- 84% of participants were satisfied with the glucose monitoring system.
Who this applies to
- Adults with type 2 diabetes.
- Individuals recently discharged from the hospital.
Keep in Mind
- Results may not be applicable to larger or more diverse populations.
- The study's short duration limits understanding of long-term outcomes.
- Further research is needed to confirm findings in a controlled setting.
Between the Lines
- Small sample size limits generalizability.
- Short follow-up period may not capture long-term effects.
- Lack of control group for comparison.
Evidence Library
Build your evidence library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Connected Evidence
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on Insulin Delivery Systems and HbA1c, Insulin Delivery Systems and Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge.
Related evidence relationships
Explore in Evidence ExplorerThis study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Insulin Delivery Systems → HbA1c
Devices & Technology
- EvidenceScore™
- 85
- Strong
- ImpactScore™
- 81
- Positive
- ConsistencyScore™
- 85
- consistent
Insulin Delivery Systems → Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge
Devices & Technology
- EvidenceScore™
- Emerging
- Score 59 · Based on 1 study
- ImpactScore™
- 50
- Neutral
- ConsistencyScore™
- unclear
- Not enough independent studies
Included in these evidence collections
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
HbA1c Evidence Hub
All studies measuring HbA1c
Measures HbA1c as a key outcome.
Insulin Delivery Systems Evidence Hub
All studies on Insulin Delivery Systems
Contributes to Insulin Delivery Systems evidence base.
Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge Evidence Hub
All studies measuring Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge
Measures Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge as a key outcome.
Explore more in Evidence Explorer
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
All studies on Continuous glucose monitoring and HbA1c
13 results
All studies on Continuous glucose monitoring and Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge
1 results
All studies on Continuous glucose monitoring
13 results
All studies measuring HbA1c
13 results
All studies measuring Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge
1 results
Questions answered by this study
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Does Insulin Delivery Systems lower HbA1c?
Insulin Delivery Systems appears to lower HbA1c.
ConsistencyScore™: Results are consistent across studies.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
HbA1c
EvidenceScore™ Strong | EvidenceScore™ 85.5 | moderate positive | ConsistencyScore™ Consistent | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on 21 supporting studies with consistent results and a positive effect signal.
Does Continuous glucose monitoring improve participant satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)?
Continuous glucose monitoring appears to improve participant satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Participant satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | strong positive | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Does Continuous glucose monitoring improve unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge?
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of Continuous glucose monitoring for unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
- 1
Unplanned hospital re-presentations within 1 month after discharge
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
- Only one supporting study is available.
Next steps
Continue your research
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Evidence topics
Follow the topics this study contributes to.
Explore in Evidence Explorer
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Related research
Read related research summaries.
No ads. No tracking.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Secure & private
Your data is always protected.
Always up to date
New studies added every day.
