Last updated August 22, 2026
Key finding
The average fiber intake was 17.1 g/day.
This study analyzed dietary fiber intake among users of a diabetes self-management app, finding an average intake of 17.1 g/day.
Quick read
The essential study design details in one scan.
EvidenceScore™
Moderate
Study type
RCTs
Follow-up
Long-Term (1–5 y)
Risk of bias
Some Concerns
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Plain-language summary
A plain-language read of the study’s main message and where it applies.
Study focus
This study analyzed dietary fiber intake among users of a diabetes self-management app, finding an average intake of 17.1 g/day.
Understanding dietary fiber intake is crucial for individuals with diabetes, as it plays a significant role in managing blood sugar levels and overall health. The findings from this study can help healthcare providers identify dietary gaps and encourage higher fiber consumption among patients, potentially improving diabetes management outcomes.
Effectiveness of the intervention remains unclear. Lack of statistical significance in reported outcomes. Limited generalizability due to specific population characteristics.
Published in
Publication details and source links for this paper.
Wei TS, Kayo W, Ryohei N, et al. Dietary Fiber Intake Among Users of a Diabetes Self-Management App: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Formative Research. 2025;9:e69340. doi:10.2196/69340
Average dietary fiber intake was 17.1 g/day.
Average fiber intake during breakfast was 4.4 g.
Average fiber intake during lunch was 5.8 g.
Average fiber intake during dinner was 6.7 g.
Evidence network
Understand where this research contributes within the broader evidence network.
This study contributes evidence to DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention and Fiber density during breakfast, Fiber density during dinner, Fiber density measured during lunch, and 2 more.
This study contributes evidence to
Primary intervention
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention
Primary outcomes
Primary intervention
Intervention and outcome relationships this study adds to the evidence network.
Editorial context
See why this paper is useful beyond its individual results.
Evidence network role
This section describes how the study fits into the current evidence network. It does not determine whether an intervention works on its own.
0
Related topics
5
Evidence pairs
0
Related studies
Core evidence
The primary outcomes reported in this study.
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber density during breakfast
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber density during breakfast
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber density during dinner
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber density during dinner
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber density measured during lunch
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber density measured during lunch
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber density measured during snacks
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber density measured during snacks
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber intake
DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention → Fiber intake
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Evidence Library
Save research, organize studies, and quickly find important evidence again.
Explore related studies, evidence collections, and research questions.
Relationships organized using the Dediabetes Evidence Intelligence™ framework.
This study contributes to evidence on DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention and Fiber density during breakfast, DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention and Fiber density during dinner.
This study contributes to the evidence on the following intervention-outcome relationships.
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Behavioral & Lifestyle
Curated evidence collections and hubs this study is part of.
All studies on DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention
Contributes to DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention evidence base.
All studies measuring Fiber density during breakfast
Measures Fiber density during breakfast as a key outcome.
All studies measuring Fiber density during dinner
Measures Fiber density during dinner as a key outcome.
Latest published studies
Published within the last 2 years.
Jump to pre-filtered views in Evidence Explorer.
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
1 results
Generated from the study's connected evidence using Evidence Intelligence™.
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention for fiber density during breakfast.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Fiber density during breakfast
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention for fiber density during dinner.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Fiber density during dinner
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention for fiber density measured during lunch.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Fiber density measured during lunch
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of DialBetesPlus mobile health intervention for fiber density measured during snacks.
ConsistencyScore™: Consistency cannot yet be determined from the available evidence.
Ranked evidence signals
Fiber density measured during snacks
EvidenceScore™ Emerging | EvidenceScore™ 59.0 | neutral | ConsistencyScore™ Unclear | 1 study
Why this answer: This answer is based on a single supporting study.
Limitations
Next steps
Choose a next path through related evidence topics, Evidence Explorer views, and research summaries.
Open broader Evidence Explorer views for this relationship.
Read related research summaries.
Focused on evidence, not advertising.
Your data is always protected.
New studies added every day.
